Wills Firpo Report States Wills Has No Chance With Dempsey

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mcvey, Mar 7, 2012.


  1. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,016
    48,121
    Mar 21, 2007
    No. He wasn't that type of fellow as far as I could see.
     
  2. Legend X

    Legend X Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,315
    664
    Mar 18, 2005

    Years later he promoted some pretty big fights, or at least fronted some big promotions.

    I don't quite understand your insistence that 'if Dempsey had wanted the fight it would have happened'. Surely the occurrence of such a fight would be contingent on the will and interests of several people, not just one.
     
  3. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,016
    48,121
    Mar 21, 2007
    Yeah, but finding a promoter whether it was in Cuba or France wouldn't have been much of a problem.

    Even Rickard spoke of a specially constructed outdoor arena on the occasions the fight was mooted in the United States.

    Of course, it is possible that promoters wouldn't have wanted to stage this huge contest and make a million dollars, but it doesn't seem likely.
     
  4. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,714
    46,390
    Feb 11, 2005
    They didn't even consider the Carpentier match to be staged in Europe. Instead they built a stadium to hold 91,000! What was the largest prize fight up to that point to be held in Europe? What was the largest paid attendance sporting event to be held in Europe at that point?

    No, sports on this scale, so far as I understand, was entirely a nascent and entirely American phenomenon.
     
  5. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,016
    48,121
    Mar 21, 2007
    Yeah, the biggest money was definitely in America.

    If Dempsey wanted to fight Wills and make money he could have gone to another country.

    Up to a quarter of a million people were wedged into Wembley for the 1923 FA cup.
     
  6. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,714
    46,390
    Feb 11, 2005
    I'm just arguing the other side. I certainly think, in boxing legacy terms, it was a crime this bout didn't occur. However, Rickard & Co. weren't in the boxing legacy business... no matter how much pride Dempsey possessed, which I think was quite a lot.
     
  7. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,016
    48,121
    Mar 21, 2007
    Yeah, they were.

    I'm not saying Dempsey even should have prioritised Wills. Nor am I saying that he was a coward for not doing so. What i'm saying is that the option existed. If a fighter wants to prove himself the very best of his era, he has to beat the other best fighters of his era. If there is another outstanding fighter in his era, he has to fight that other outstanding fighter to prove that he is better. Dempsey didn't do this, and given that Wills arguably bested superior men, I believe this leaves the question in doubt.

    My point in this thread has been, there's no point in blaming it all on New York. Dempsey was an adult alpha-male millionaire superstar. There was likely very little he couldn't have made happen if that had been his desire - like Mayweather and Pacquiao now, he had the power. He wasn't beholden to New York any more than he was beholden to Rickard or Kearns. Jesus, the bellboy that testified against Rickard in that unfortunate **** case wasn't even beholden.

    If Dempsey wanted Wills - if he wanted to prove he was unquestionably the best HW of his time - he could have done so, almost unquestionably. That he didn't means different things to different people, and that's fair enough, but let's not have any confusion.
     
  8. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,714
    46,390
    Feb 11, 2005
    Could he have done it without Rickard or Kearns? Was he contractually obligated to them for all title defenses? Furthermore, what was Rickard's real motivation in not wanting this fight? The altruistic avoidance race riots? Or a real fear of losing the monetary potential of the crown?
     
  9. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    400
    Jan 22, 2010
    Mc, first of all...Who is KG ?
    1- I only answer statements ending with a question mark...
    2- In your type of land of fairness, CHARLEY BURLEY, regardless of not
    being officially designated No #1, would have got a shot at Ray Robinson
    by your standards of fairness. i recall Burley's name mentioned amongst
    the Stillman gym crowd when I was there. His name was feared and acknowledged to be on a par with Ray Robinson...Tell me Mc, what Welterweight that Robinson gave a money shot to, was SUPERIOR to Burley, during the 1940s??? You have selective standards to fit your desires or arguments. Truly Robinson by the logic of today's posters should have fought a Charley Burley, who would have kicked the tar out of any #1
    welterweight that Robby fought...# 1 is just a number...But Robby [best fighter I ever saw] get's a pass but Dempsey get's the shaft....
    To say that Joe louis who I loved, fought the best fighters while not giving a Lee Q Murray, Harry Bobo, Lem Franklin,Elmer Ray, black fighters of the day a money shot, is bogus....He fought one top black fighter when he was
    in his prime, the LH great John Henry Lewis, because Lewis was going blind and to give JH Lewis one last payday. He promptly flattened Leweis in the very first round for Lewis's last fight...
    So, Mc , yes Harry Wills was rated #1 for awhile. Yes they [Dempsey] did sign for a bout.
    And yes Wills should of gotten a shot, but I will not regurgitate the past on this post again...But Dempsey was no more of a villian than a Louis or a Robinson in their dealings...As the Godfather said ,"it is strictly business".
     
  10. Legend X

    Legend X Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,315
    664
    Mar 18, 2005
    Some promoters certainly did want to stage it.
    I'm not sure about Cuba or France. An American promoter in Cuba maybe, like when Johnson fought Willard - but that wasn't a massive million-dollar gate type affair.

    Obviously both fighters would want to be paid well. So it would have to be a big promotion like Dempsey v Carpentier.

    Promoting a fight on such a scale probably wasn't an easy task. Look how Gibbons and Shelby, Montana got jobbed.

    Floyd Fitzsimmons wanted it I think. I think he operated around Indiana, Illinois or Michigan, maybe.
    And I think the Chicago Coliseum wanted it.
    New York state tried to enforce Dempsey v Wills in 1926, but whether that was genuine or just politics I don't know.
    A few years earlier the NY boxing commission had barred any suggestion of it.

    I can't blame Dempsey for it not happening. Maybe he really wanted it, but was wrongly advised that it was a very bad idea and was offered lucrative alternatives.
    Promoters, managers, advisers are paid to do all that stuff, they make the fights, choose the opponents and sort out everything, come up with the money.
    The fighter just trains and fights - that's his job.
     
  11. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,016
    48,121
    Mar 21, 2007
    Yes. He was connected to Fitzsimmons (not the famous one) on more than one occasion where a Greb fight is concerned.

    Even if he were (and I don't think he was) he can fight Wills. The conversation might have gone something like this (excuse me for not attempting to recreate how they actually spoke or whatever, with all apologies to Cross_Trainer).

    JD: I want Wills next.

    TR: I don't think it's going to fly in New York.

    JD: OK, let's do it elsewhere.

    TR: ...Chicago, maybe...

    JD: Don't maybe me. Take it to Cuba if you have to.

    TR: There isn't the same money in Cuba.

    JD: I don't give a **** about the money. There are guys out there who think Wills is better than me. I can't have that. I won't have that. Also, i'm worried about geeks in the future thinking i'm not as good as him and talking about it on some sort of free-to-air wireless. You fix this fight Tex. I'm not going to tell you again.

    DK: Jack, we can make more money fighin' Firpo again right here, what do you wanna go to Cuba for, there's no dames!*

    JD: You listen to me you little *****. You been eating for free for to long. There's gonna be another fight. The fight is gonna be Wills. I don't want anyone else. I won't fight anyone else. Get me Wills. Get me him if I have to only add 150,00 to my enormous fortune, rather than the 400,000 i'm used to. Because I want to prove i'm the best. That's important too. It's important to make money. But it's not everything.

    DK: ...OK Jack.



    *token gesture

    At the end of the day, as the man once said, this is smoke-filled coffee-house crap, do you know what I mean? I love it, you love it, but it's nonsense. All these guys, and their fans, Pacquiao, Mayweather, trying to put it off on management and each other. You're young, you're bad, you're a millionaire, you're the best at what you do, you're the ultimate alpha male, but you can't get it done because the bad man in the suit won't let you? In many ways, nah, in all ways, this is even more pathetic than being downright outright scared. Fortunately, no is it true. We just allow the wool to be pulled over our eyes far to often.
     
  12. Legend X

    Legend X Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,315
    664
    Mar 18, 2005

    Dempsey split with Kearns some time in 1925 I think, maybe before. But Kearns insisted he had a contract. Ugly lawsuits ensued.
    I think Dempsey's contract with Kearns ended just before he fought Tunney. But it was all disputed of course.

    Anyway, Dempsey was something of a "free agent" in spirit at least, from 1925 onwards.
    But he took his advice from Tex Rickard obviously. The familiar story, fighter splits with manager, 'manages self' or 'hires' a manager - under the close guidance of big promoter !
    Add mischievous new wife to champ's life and you have the classic Hollywood script.


    Rickard blocked the Wills fight.
    He told Dempsey it was 'no go' and that any rival promoter who reckoned they could deliver it was bullshitting.
    His motives were financial.
    From experience, he figured a black heavyweight champion would attract a load of noise and attention from people who didn't give a damn about the fight game. Trouble would ensue. Boxing would be sent back into the underground. Profits would dry up.
    That was his reasoning.
    He wasn't looking out for anyone but himself, and the 'health of the fight game' which was the business he was in.
     
  13. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,714
    46,390
    Feb 11, 2005
    I figure I have read half a dozen books on Dempsey and still don't feel I have a full reasoning of why this bout never materialized... outside that Rickard kept creating profitable distractions and Dempsey was caught up with the Hollywood lifestyle.
     
  14. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,016
    48,121
    Mar 21, 2007
    Kid Gavilan.

    I only meant the original question, the one where I ask you what you think of Dempsey going abroad to fight Wills. You didn't answer it, you just provided a litany of excuses as to why it didn't happen and tried to draw what I consider to be non-existent parallels with Sugar and Louis.

    Actually, I think it was grossly unfair that Burley didn't get a shot at Robinson, title or otherwise, but I don't think you can say that Robinson ducked his #1 contender, even if you say he ducked Burley.

    None. I consider that Kid Gavilan was on a par with Charley Burley and many would consider him Burley's superior though.

    With all due respect, this is total bull****. Wills was basically Dempsey's #1 contender for the best part of seven years. Burley never fought in the welterweight division after Robinson came to the title, and was retired before Robinson lifted the middleweight crown.

    It is you, I am afraid, who is trying to engineer a parallel where none exists for reasons of desire and argument.

    I doubt he would have "kicked the tar" out of Kid Gavilan, although I might just favour him by the slenderest of margins.

    Here's another number: 156. That's the closest Burley got to WW during Robinson's tenure as champion. Robinson denied a pretty big MW a title shot. It was a number of years since Zivic had run Burley out of the division, and there's little proof he could have made it back without hurting himself, I'm afraid.

    No, he doesn't get a pass. His failure to fight Burley has actually been one of the more controversial ommissions in my time on the board, and has been debated fiercely.

    Dempsey gets it tighter, yes, for reasons that are documented.


    None of these guys were ever the best around. Louis consistently matched the best around. These guys were good, but apart from Ray, who was very briefly at #1 before being eliminated I believe, none were ever a part of the equation.

    Louis almost always matched his #1 contender, then beat up soft white guys on his day off.

    Dempsey never met his #1 contender.

    See the difference?

    All the while. It is the longest and most consistent "duck" of any #1 contender in all of the history of boxing.
     
  15. Legend X

    Legend X Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,315
    664
    Mar 18, 2005

    If the promoters don't have the power, they wouldn't exist.