Wills Firpo Report States Wills Has No Chance With Dempsey

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mcvey, Mar 7, 2012.


  1. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,016
    48,121
    Mar 21, 2007
    To be fair, neither am I, but for the most part I'm happy to assume that the chance to make 50, 60 grand would be enough to make some of these big men want to be involved with the most important sporting spectacle of the then-modern era. And there was likely to be a lot more than that around!
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,016
    48,121
    Mar 21, 2007
    Yeah, that's true, but it stops being true after a while.
     
  3. Legend X

    Legend X Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,315
    664
    Mar 18, 2005
    Wills was shafted.
    There's not that much more to say.
    Denied a title shot he had clearly earned.
    It happened sometimes.
     
  4. Legend X

    Legend X Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,315
    664
    Mar 18, 2005

    Yeah, these days maybe with guys like Mayweather, Klitschkos, Haye promoting their own careers.

    But you only have to go back to the days of Don King to see a load of fighters doing whatever Don thinks best.
     
  5. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,016
    48,121
    Mar 21, 2007
    That's true to a degree, but let's look at a couple of examples involving genuine superstars.

    Roy Jones. Roy declined to sign with King for more than one fight. This meant he was free to fight anyone at anytime - in theory. It actually made the Jones-Benn showdown impossible on account of King had him post - Eubank II. But Jones had control of his own career because he told King to eff off.

    Mike Tyson. When Tyson came out of jail he took the decision to sign with King based upon money. Before that, he'd steered clear of King, and had options open to him when he got out.

    This is because, like Mayweather, Dempsey or Pacquiao, he was bigger than any promoter.
     
  6. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    400
    Jan 22, 2010
    And we are CREATURES of OUR times...!
     
  7. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,016
    48,121
    Mar 21, 2007
    Nothing in that post can be contradicted with this line? Unless you are contending that everything anyone ever did can be dismissed by the fact that it happened in the past?
     
  8. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,718
    46,394
    Feb 11, 2005
    As in all negotiations, one party had everything to gain, one had much less to gain. Wills needed Dempsey much more than the other way around. He was always going to be dealing from a disadvantage, and given the times, that imbalance was exaggerated.
     
  9. Dempsey1238

    Dempsey1238 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,720
    3,559
    Jul 10, 2005
    For 7 years.

    I know people bring up 1925 of when the fight fail though and all that, but what about the years 1919, 1920, 21, 22, 23, 24, 26, ?

    I mean Dempsey was not fighting any one for 4 of the 7 years. Wills should have gotting a chance at the title. We cant really say for sure who would win, but Wills was a danger, and I dont agree with the no chance thing.
     
  10. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    400
    Jan 22, 2010
    And it has happened time and again before Dempsey, and since Dempsey, including today...Tell me would today's thought police feel better if Dempsey's body was exhumed and tarred and feathered ? Yes Dempsey was an evil man, but today's idol Ali, could call people ugly, Uncle Tom, gorilla, washwomen, and taunt his hapless victims under the guise of
    showmanship....But he is a hero to today's ESB posters, whilst a Dempsey
    is villified for not fighting a Harry Wills, though they did sign for a bout...
    In my heart I know I'm closer to reality than Dempsey's haters...
    McGrain, what an Ali did to one of my hero's Joe Frazier, was a hell of a lot worse than Dempsey did...A hell of a lot worse.....I remember those terrible aspersions to a decent Joe Frazer a heck of a lot more vividly than you. But of course some posters pick a more vulnerable target to target their anger...
     
  11. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,442
    9,428
    Jul 15, 2008
    Burt, there has not been one other heavyweight champion in history who ducked his number one contender for his entire reign. Dempsey was champ for seven years and did not give Wills a bout. It was and remains inexplicable. When you consider that Wills was a bigger and stronger man who fought much better competition than Dempsey ever did you have an extremely well promoted legend with a huge asterisk ...
     
  12. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,561
    21,927
    Sep 15, 2009
    Honestly, in light of the race riots sparked by johnson v jeffries, i'm not surprised rickard refused to make the fight.

    Jack did his bit by signing to fight wills. When the fight was on the table he took it.

    I wouldn't classify this as a duck at all. A tragedy yes, an unfortunate byproduct of very bad times in american history.

    I don't think anyone would seriously doubt that jack would have gone through with the fight he signed, nor that he'd have gone through with the fight had ted made it in the early 20's.

    It isn't like bowe throwing his belt in the trash to avoid his number 1 contender.

    We can rightly bemoan the fact that the fight didn't happen, but unless i've missed something, there's no blame to be laid at the feet of jack.
     
  13. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    400
    Jan 22, 2010
    Yes Mc ,generations learn from mistakes of the past. Dempsey was the fighter, Jack Kearns and Tex Rickard were the financial brains, picking the bouts for Dempsey. Dempsey who struggled mightily in his hobo youth, and finally hit the bigtime was not concerned by what today's ESB posters thought of his career 85 years later. He WAS a product of his time. He had many black sparring partners as Big Bill Tate and George Godfrey... He helped his old foe, John Lester Johnson years later by paying his expenses
    in the nursing home JL Johnson was in before he died...Dempsey served in the second WW, in his forties during the invasion, that he insisted he be with his troops...In his retirement, nary a bad word was ever said about him. He was along with Joe Louis, my hero in spite of the B.S. tossed his way...When a man dies we look at a man's life in totality. And Dempsey passed the test.....Regardless of biased ESB naysayers...
     
  14. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    400
    Jan 22, 2010
    Luf, thank you for a little sanity...Until I learned the computer and joined this forum, the name Dempsey conjured a picture of a great fighter, who
    never met Harry Wills in a ring though they signed...In all those years
    this non fight was never brought up to besmirch the reputation of Jack Dempsey, as it is on this PC forum. The oldtime writers I read who saw Dempsey and Wills knew the circumstances of those times a hell of a lot better than today's, flame throwers who were they to have been in Dempsey's shoes, {if they survived his hobo days], would have done no different...Is it wonderful to feel so noble 85 years later after the fact ? Cheers Luf.
     
  15. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,016
    48,121
    Mar 21, 2007
    This is nothing to do with the era. This is nothing to do with generational bias. And this is NOTHING to do with race.

    This is to do with a fighter who decided to do what his manager/promoter told him as opposed to the rarer type that goes after all and any fighter anywhere on the landscape that could be considered a threat, guys like Ali, Greb, Gans, Elbows McFadden, Barbados Joe Walcott. These guys had managers and promoters too but they went out of their way to fight the best.