Wills Turned Down $5000 Chance To Spar With Challenger Dempsey In 1919

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mcvey, Nov 22, 2012.


  1. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,657
    28,959
    Jun 2, 2006
  2. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,725
    Sep 14, 2005
    At least Wills had the balls to fight a near prime Sam Langford in 1914. Dempsey wouldn't even take on a old sam langford in 1917, and ran out of the ring against 40 year old Joe Jeanette in 1919.
     
  3. Longhhorn71

    Longhhorn71 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,714
    3,453
    Jan 6, 2007
    Interesting.....where are sources for those statements?...books or newspapers would be good enough.
     
  4. guncho

    guncho next champion! Full Member

    4,963
    514
    Oct 15, 2007
  5. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,671
    21,286
    Sep 15, 2009
    Is it that usual for fellow contenders to be main sparring partners? Giving away secrets and what not?
     
  6. Boilermaker

    Boilermaker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,372
    473
    Oct 6, 2004
  7. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,261
    Sep 5, 2011

    On Langford and Dempsey, Dempsey did say in his 1959 autobiography that his manager was arranging a fight with Langford and that he rejected it.

    He went on to say, if I remember correctly, that he could never imagine himself beating Langford, although he could see himself beating Jack Johnson.
     
  8. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    264
    Jul 22, 2004
    'By Jack Kearns' :lol: reading the story it sounds like BS and a weak defence of why they weren't trying to make the fight

    Even if true why would he take 5k to be a sparring partner anyway, he was already nigh on the number 1 contender
     
  9. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    398
    Jan 22, 2010
    Your so biased and disengenuous trotting that Dempsey "ran out of the ring" against the 40 year old Jeannette...B.S.
    The truih is Dempsey's opponent cancelled at the last minute and the old Jeannette was suggested at the last minute as a sub. Of course jack kearns refused to trot in a new opponent at the last minute...Think of what a trend that would start, signing a fighter with the intention of canceling out at the last second and substituting a "ringer" at the last moment...
    A contract is a contract, is a contract....Jack Kearns knew a helluva lot more than you do I suspect.....
    LET Dempsey's soul rest in peace I say...Pick on a guy who can defend himself, hard as it may be...cheers.
     
  10. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    264
    Jul 22, 2004
    Which all sort of makes it quite unlikely that Kearns asked the superior Wills to try and publically take Dempsey's head off before Dempsey's most important career fight, without him or Dempsey making a cent out of it
     
  11. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,657
    28,959
    Jun 2, 2006
    If I remember rightly, Dempsey was fighting a benefit for nothing and Jeannette was switched as his opponent at the last minute.
     
  12. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,657
    28,959
    Jun 2, 2006
    The only win for Wills win over Jeannette, was when Joe was 40.:lol: Dempsey refused to fight Langford in the beginning of 1916 when Dempsey was managed by John The Barber Reisler .Dempsey also refused Frank Moran, and Gunboat Smith as alternative opponents, after a great deal of pressure from Reisler he agreed to fight John Lester Johnson and was nearly ruined by his avaricious and unscrupulous manager.

    N.B. A month after Reisler tried to make Dempsey fight Sam ,Langford ko'd Wills and , 6 days later beat Sam McVey.

    Wise move on Dempsey's part.

    Dempsey running out on Jeannette?
    Dempsey was due to fight a benefit for free ,at the last second Jeannette was substituted for the original opponent, and Kearns rightly pulled him out.
     
  13. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,657
    28,959
    Jun 2, 2006
    I can't vouch for the veracity of Kearns article though, since it was printed in 1925 ,and Wills was very much alive ,you would have thought he was running the risk of libel if it was untrue.

    Just for you P.P.

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5zWBRQpzFY[/ame]
     
  14. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    398
    Jan 22, 2010
    mc, I believe you are correct that Dempsey was boxing a benefit and his opponent cancelled out leaving by coincidence Joe Jeannette waiting in the wings...
    Pray tell me what fighter in history is maligned on ESB as much as Jack Dempsey by "hollier than thou" posters going way beyond normal criticisms
    bordering on paranoia ?...Almost every fighter in history has been flawed
    in their lives, but escape the SOCIAL nitpicking that a decent man Jack Dempsey faces by A FEW on ESB. Only on the ESB site by a few disgruntled posters, who get their rocks off lambasting one of the true toughest fighters ever, who gave no quarter and ASKED for no quarter...Cheers mc...
     
  15. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,657
    28,959
    Jun 2, 2006
    I know he is 38 here, but Wills does look slow and ponderous against Paulino here in this decent print of their fight. The ko punch looks pretty innocuous but Wills seems to have gone back badly.

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LBOUmkoI44w&feature=related[/ame]