Wills v Firpo Colorized by d brown

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Tonto62, Aug 16, 2019.



  1. Tonto62

    Tonto62 Active Member Full Member

    1,078
    812
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Mar 26, 2011
  2. Seamus

    Seamus Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    39,464
    6,784
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Feb 11, 2005
    Sure doesn't help make Firpo look any better.
     
  3. Tonto62

    Tonto62 Active Member Full Member

    1,078
    812
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Mar 26, 2011
    Firpo did not train much for the fight and was heavier than for Dempsey,but no, he wasn't an early Willie Pep! I don't think Wills looks anything special either.
     
  4. Cecil

    Cecil Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,007
    1,613
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Mar 22, 2015
    Got to agree, although I expected what I saw of Firpo, but Wills didn’t look too good.
     
  5. BitPlayerVesti

    BitPlayerVesti The Ad Wolgast of Googling Stuff Full Member

    4,738
    4,224
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Oct 28, 2017
    You have to remember how long Wills had been fighting at this point.

    His best wins were probably in 1915, this was 9 years later.
     
    roughdiamond, Cecil, louis54 and 2 others like this.
  6. Tonto62

    Tonto62 Active Member Full Member

    1,078
    812
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Mar 26, 2011
    Wills was 32 with 96 fights under his belt
    Want to compare that with Charles effort against Marciano when he was 33 a month off 34 with 96 fights ?
    Or Moore's fight with Marciano when 38/40, with 176 fights on his clock?
    Langford's draw with Wills when Sam was 34 with 184 fights under his belt?
     
    Last edited: Aug 16, 2019
    louis54 likes this.
  7. Seamus

    Seamus Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    39,464
    6,784
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Feb 11, 2005
    Different fighters have different lengths of prime. Tyson, Dempsey and Marciano are considered great even tho they had relatively short primes. Plus, Wills was getting screwed by the game. He should have already had his shot and instead was continuing to have to prove himself. They even wanted him to fight Tunney not too long after this... as another step to prove he deserved a shot. It is quite possible he burned out a bit early due to these circumstances.
     
    KasimirKid and roughdiamond like this.
  8. BitPlayerVesti

    BitPlayerVesti The Ad Wolgast of Googling Stuff Full Member

    4,738
    4,224
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Oct 28, 2017
    His age wasn't known, there are conflicting ages on multiple documents.

    When was his last notable win before this? He didn't have any after this either.

    Charles was certainly nearing his end at the top when he fought Rocky too, and Rocky basically finished him.
     
    KasimirKid likes this.
  9. Cecil

    Cecil Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,007
    1,613
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Mar 22, 2015
    That’s fair enough, I haven’t seen much of Wills.
    Is there much film exists of him?
     
  10. Tonto62

    Tonto62 Active Member Full Member

    1,078
    812
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Mar 26, 2011
    Charles looks 100% better than Wills in their respective fights which is my point.
    Where is the source for Wills age not being known?
    Both Box Rec & CBZ have his DOB as 15th May 1898.
    After retiring with a broken wrist against Battling Jim Johnson in1917, and apart from a dsq against Bill Tate , whom he had defeated 3 times twice by ko. Wills went 7 years and 50 fights without defeat prior to the Firpo fight .
    So where is the evidence of his decline?
    I give you figures, you give me theories!
     
    Last edited: Aug 17, 2019 at 2:44 AM
  11. BitPlayerVesti

    BitPlayerVesti The Ad Wolgast of Googling Stuff Full Member

    4,738
    4,224
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Oct 28, 2017
    Not other than some even later ones
     
  12. BitPlayerVesti

    BitPlayerVesti The Ad Wolgast of Googling Stuff Full Member

    4,738
    4,224
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Oct 28, 2017
    Charles also lost to Valdes, I'd agree Charles is better, but you have to accept few fighters will be near their peak 9 years after their best win. I'd say his declining quality of opposition and the less complimentary news reports are decent evidence.

    There are sites online you can find records, his grave stone for example gives a different age to his marrige certificate. There are too many common details on the records for them to be different people.

    Klompton looked, probably more thoroughly, and came to the same conclusion. It was discussed in another thread, I can link it if you're interested.
     
  13. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. Full Member

    48,258
    4,612
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jun 29, 2007
    Yes, and he doesn't look good in any of them. I'm pretty sure we saw Wills vs Madden here, and Wills at age 32 looks just okay. You can also see him at end of his career getting KO'd by Uzcudun,
     
    Cecil likes this.