Win or Loss against Cotto, who do you think PAC will fight next on March 2010?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by buxzer, Oct 5, 2009.


  1. buxzer

    buxzer Eastern Champ Full Member

    6,107
    0
    Oct 4, 2008
    .
    This content is protected


    PAC could be the underdog against Floyd but I'm sure if these 2 boxers meet, PAC won't reach a 4 to 1 underdog status against Floyd... PAC is no JMM... PAC-Floyd is not a total mismatch... Again right now, the odds for PAC-Floyd is about 1 1/2 to 1 slightly favoring Floyd...


    This content is protected


    That's my opinion to have Floyd as PAC's farewell fight... That fight could be awesome and good for boxing... Do you have any boxer in mind instead of Floyd as PAC's final fight??


    This content is protected


    Well JMM have not publicly said that he's retiring unlike PAC who already announced that he has 2 or 3 fights left (including the Cotto fight)... JMM even actively chasing a Hatton fight... JMM could also possibly fight Katsidis...


    This content is protected


    Who said that PAC has zero, nil, zip chance against Floyd?? Every boxer has a chance to win... PAC-Floyd won't be a tune up since Floyd is already back in the mix after a long lay-off/retirement...


    This content is protected


    Floyd actually is very popular boxer... for all the wrong reasons... He's a loudmouth, a villian, avoids tough competitions, a braggart, a con man, unprofessional, irresponsible... See he's so popular because of these wrong reasons...


    This content is protected


    I don't have any vested interest if PAC makes more money in his fights... Coz do I have a share of that money??:rofl


    This content is protected


    The difference between PAC vs. Floyd and Floyd vs. JMM is, many people were demanding/clamoring for a PAC vs. Floyd fight... Look at the polls, PAC-Floyd is leading in most polls... Now talking about Floyd-JMM, were there any considerable number of people asking Floyd vs. JMM to be made?? None... nada...:lol:
    .