Winky is Better than Hopkins

BHOP is one of the greatest at 160 of all time. I love Winky but he is not better than BHOP. (and no one put a gun to Winky's head and made him fight Bhop at Light heavy). :deal

BHOP beats Winky at 160 as well.

 

winky is **** :blurp


always hasbeen and always hasbeen


sorry did i say hasbeen twice???


****in winky

 

well winky should've beaten him at any weight if he was better. their weight difference is not that big.

 

Glad you supported your thought thoroughly, used style analysis, sources, and logic to convince us your argument was valid...:scaredas:


you're a ****ing moron.

delete.:good

 

the gameplan bhop had against winky beats winky anytime at any weight

 

False. :deal

 

No, most people think he didn't. At 42 years old he beat him. Winky was walking around at the Hatton-Mayweather fight like a lost cause with nobody to fight and nobody interested in co-promoting (cus' lets face it, Winky Promotions never really got off the ground).

BHop is a top-10 ATG Middleweight by most standards, and there's a little more history in actually being a top-10 Middleweight than maybe being a top-10 Junior-Middleweight.

Hopkins at 42 beat Winky. Have you seen a prime Hopkins? Post-RJJ yet pre-ODLH? Probably not.

So my question to you, ignorant thread starter, what does Winky do that could defeat Hopkins? Cus' i saw a 42 year old man command the ring like a general and win a convincing (albeit boring) fight over the young defensive wizard. Hopkins took away his jab with ease.

 

:good

 

Like him all you want, he's the worse fighter of the two. :good

Winky isn't looking too likely to get into Canastota. They saved some space for Hopkins years ago.

 

winky couldnt beat 42 yr old bhop so prime for prime he still loses

 

Young Winky? You mean the one KD'ed 5 times in one fight?