Winky Wright vs Floyd Mayweather, who takes it?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by tommyg6, Aug 16, 2017.


Which choice?

  1. Wright by stoppage

    1 vote(s)
    2.9%
  2. Wright by decision

    15 vote(s)
    44.1%
  3. Mayweather by stoppage

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. Mayweather by decision

    18 vote(s)
    52.9%
  1. vargasfan1985

    vargasfan1985 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,449
    5,783
    Mar 8, 2008
    Read that Wright slipped a lot while taking punches. He was never down again after that until the Quillen fight if I'm correct. Long time without getting put down.
     
  2. vargasfan1985

    vargasfan1985 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,449
    5,783
    Mar 8, 2008
    The way Wright would stalk him, it wouldn't be boring.
     
  3. vargasfan1985

    vargasfan1985 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,449
    5,783
    Mar 8, 2008
    I think it's funny people say Floyd beats him. Winky is a full fledged, 154 guy. Hard jab, doesn't get hit clean at all, can take a punch, has very good stamina.

    This is a nightmare matchup for Floyd.
     
    Jackomano likes this.
  4. boxerfan13

    boxerfan13 Member Full Member

    406
    265
    Jun 10, 2012
    Wright would beat Floyd. I've always thought the type of fighters that would give Floyd problems are the BIG WW's and Jr MW's who have a jab and a tight D. But Winky is much bigger than Floyd.. So that isn't really saying much about Winky.. Other than he's bigger and is skilled enough to use his size to his advantage
     
  5. vargasfan1985

    vargasfan1985 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,449
    5,783
    Mar 8, 2008
    Someone with a brain. Floyd has nothing to keep Wright off him and Wright can use his freakishly long arms and elbows to block all incoming shots. He would walk forward, use his jab and overpower Floyd.
     
  6. BewareofDawg

    BewareofDawg P4P Champ Full Member

    27,677
    184
    Apr 8, 2006
    Agreed, he was very avoided, then badly self-managed. He should've been a much bigger star. The Hopkins fight was just bull****.
     
  7. Serge

    Serge Ginger Dracula Staff Member

    84,199
    139,886
    Jul 21, 2009
    Vasquez was a damned good fighter in his prime and a heavy hitter. Love me some JCV.

    This content is protected


    And wtf was wrong with that ref at the 1:06 mark?
     
  8. Radrook

    Radrook Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,923
    917
    Feb 24, 2017
    Yep! That Vasquez fellow was like an unstoppable tank! Argentina has the knack of producing good boxers that's for sure.


    About the ref at 1:06

    Well, we can safely assume that he isn't blind-right? So one tends to suppose that he wants that fighter to get seriously injured or killed for personal reasons which have nothing to do with boxing. That's the impression that the ref during the Ali Holmes fight and the ref during the Duran vs Davy Moor fight conveyed as well.

    BTW
    Humans in positions where they can physically harm other humans, such as surgeons, dentists, chiropractors, xray technicians, etc will sometimes be tempted to do so for personal reasons involving prejudice, racism, sadistic tendencies or just plain personal dislike of the individual. That's one reason why mal-practice cases come up. I don't see why a ref should not be held as equally accountable.
     
    Last edited: Aug 17, 2017
    Serge likes this.
  9. Serge

    Serge Ginger Dracula Staff Member

    84,199
    139,886
    Jul 21, 2009
    Never seen a blind ref but there are plenty of conveniently blind ones out there who only see what they want to see. I think this one just wanted to give JCV's opponent every chance.. every chance to end up getting seriously hurt. Some refs follow the Marquis de Sade's rules as opposed to the Marquess of Queensberry's.
     
    Radrook likes this.
  10. Radrook

    Radrook Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,923
    917
    Feb 24, 2017
    The question is why a ref who blatantly ignores a fighter' safety isn't held professionally accountable for it. After all, a ref is there to protect by assuring adherence to rules.

    As the ref in the Pac vs horn fight Horn said to Horn when he notice danger of serious injury:

    "I am here to protect you!"
     
    Serge likes this.
  11. Serge

    Serge Ginger Dracula Staff Member

    84,199
    139,886
    Jul 21, 2009
    Yes. That ref in the JVC fight just stood there like a rabbit in headlights. Totally inexcusable.
     
  12. vargasfan1985

    vargasfan1985 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,449
    5,783
    Mar 8, 2008
    He turned down 5 million for a a rematch with Taylor, for the title, and didn't even make that amount for his next 3 fights that all ended up being losses.

    I'm not sure it was bad management as much as it was just bad judgment. Wright was very stubborn. But hey, 11-3-1 record in title fights, 2 time champ at 154, with the second being undisputed, 51-3 going into the Taylor fight and winding up 51-6-1, not a bad career by any stretch. Winning at 160 would have been the cherry on top. Sadly, he let his ego ruin that one. Still going to the HOF, no doubt. He could have ruled 160 for a little bit if he just shut up and fought.
     
    BewareofDawg likes this.
  13. lepinthehood

    lepinthehood When I'm drinking you leave me well alone banned Full Member

    52,103
    23,328
    Aug 27, 2011
    Winky wright very good. beats floyd close UD
     
  14. boxerfan13

    boxerfan13 Member Full Member

    406
    265
    Jun 10, 2012
    Anybody much bigger than Floyd should beat Floyd if they have the requisite skill. REALLY good big men will always beat a great little man. Always.
     
  15. Jackomano

    Jackomano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,369
    7,199
    Nov 22, 2014
    This. As much as I like Floyd Winky would be all wrong for Floyd. Floyd at 154 was very selective with his opponents for good reason.