Winner take all.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by koko of phil, Nov 29, 2009.


  1. koko of phil

    koko of phil Ring of Fire Resident Full Member

    2,246
    0
    Mar 20, 2005
    Who do you think has more balls to quickly accept the "winner take all" match up, Floyd or Pac?

    I think this idea is much better than 50-50. The better man deserves all.
     
  2. bladerunner

    bladerunner El Intocable Full Member

    33,921
    133
    Jul 20, 2004
    I could see two fighters fighting for "pennies" doing it but not with the kind of money thats involved in this fights that would be stupid.

    This is not fight club.
     
  3. Trenaman

    Trenaman Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,614
    0
    Feb 7, 2006
    I'm pretty sure Pac likes money as much as Floyd he just dont need to call himself money! Never happen and why shuld it, both deserve to be well paid 50/50 is fair.
     
  4. Dojo

    Dojo The Animal Full Member

    1,353
    2
    Aug 29, 2005
    If anyone would, it wouldn't be the guy who calls himself "Money".

    Legacy don't pay the bills, and Floyd don't pay the taxes.:yep
     
  5. arm chicken

    arm chicken Active Member Full Member

    730
    0
    Apr 4, 2009
    and what happens if its a bad call by a ref? or a bad decision, the loser having no money would seem like an actual robbery.
     
  6. tojikiston

    tojikiston Contender Full Member

    1,179
    1
    Aug 3, 2009
    It will never happen, but if it did: Pac might do it!!!!

    But, greedy piece of **** like UglyBoy would rather pimp out his mother and daughter, then risk any penny in the fight!!!

    That ******* is trully a disgrace to boxing!!! With so much talent, he's a complete *******!!!
     
  7. Gneus7

    Gneus7 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,277
    495
    Mar 29, 2007
    Great idea that will never happen