With all the criticism for sky ppv's recently.. is Brook - Khan PPV?

I think it needs a good undercard as all ppv should

 

Yes it's PPV

 

Sky Sports subscribers already pay for boxing so there is no justification for any PPV fights on Sky regardless of who is fighting.

The best way to stop this is to boycott all PPVs and don't buy tickets until this ****e stops.

80,000 red plastic seats at Wembley in June 2015 would be a good start.

 

Think they can get away with this on PPV with something like quigg/frampton as chief support, AJ in a british title fight and one other name on the bill

 

Agreed.

 

people miss the point with this ****. how the hell could this fight happen unless it was PPV?

Khan will want millions of pounds for this fight, which is fair enough, so how could it possibly happen unless it was PPV? Sky aren't going to just pay for a fight that they know is going to lose lots of money? Eddie Hearn isn't going to do it.

So if someone can explain in a realistic fashion way how this fight happens without PPV i'd like to hear it.

 

Agreed.

 

this... :good

 

I see this as a bigger fight than Froch Groves II. It's annoying having PPV, but this is the biggest domestic dust up in the UK, so I won't be anywhere near being as annoyed as having to pay for the Bellew Clev fight.

 

The point is that none of these fighters are worth paying millions of pounds for a fight and neither was Froch or Groves.

These ****s earn enough over their career without obscene amounts of PPV money on top.

 

If they don't want to fight for affordable sums then **** them :rasta

 

It will be and to be honest i wont moan too loudly as this one of the biggest fights that can be made outside of the states.

 

:good