I don't intend to argue this, I only want to see what people think. When I was growing up, reading books and magazines (what the hell are those, right?) about boxing history, the fact that guys like Savold and Terrell were mentioned as having held "world titles" by the EBU and WBA, respectively, was glossed over, or even mocked. But here we are with four recognized sanctioning bodies sponsoring titles, a couple of other pretender organizations, and each throwing up endless mandatories so that nothing can ever be unified. The WBA recognizes 2-3 champions at a time, and the WBC looks to be following suit. So, are Terrell and Savold, in hindsight, a bit more credible as champions? Again, I've no dog in this fight.