With the exception of Thomas Hearns could any of Haglers opponents

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by quintonjacksonfan, Sep 25, 2020.


  1. quintonjacksonfan

    quintonjacksonfan Active Member Full Member

    1,334
    1,112
    Jul 21, 2004
  2. dmt

    dmt Hardest hitting hw ever Full Member

    11,393
    17,226
    Jul 2, 2006
    Leonard

    I can't see the 1983 Duran beating McCullum, great as he was.

    Mike is too good for Sibson, Mugabe, Minter etc. beating him, though they are all really good fighters.
     
  3. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,340
    9,955
    Jun 23, 2008
    Not sure what kind of point you're trying to prove, but Hagler was flat out better than McCallum.
     
  4. The Morlocks

    The Morlocks Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,717
    8,944
    Nov 21, 2009
    Hamsho would laugh at McCallums punches and run him out of the ring. Sibson beats him. Mugabi that fought Hagler stops him. Mc callum is soooo overrated. 15rds with Sean Mannion? McCallum would last 7 rds with Hagler. If Curry wobbled him watch out.
     
  5. The Morlocks

    The Morlocks Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,717
    8,944
    Nov 21, 2009
    Duran shows him what real body punching and power is.. Stoppage in 10.
     
  6. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    27,131
    44,903
    Mar 3, 2019
    Outside of Leonard? No. Duran could do it, but I wouldn't put a penny on it.
     
    christpuncher likes this.
  7. Minotauro

    Minotauro Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,628
    713
    May 22, 2007
    I would favour Leonard due to his speed and guessing over 12. None of the others, apparently McCallum used to get the better of Hearns when they sparred and expect him to stop Tommy late.
     
  8. The Morlocks

    The Morlocks Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,717
    8,944
    Nov 21, 2009
    Leo was **** that night. Hag was just worse.
     
  9. HolDat

    HolDat Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,593
    2,745
    Sep 25, 2020
    McCallum was past his prime at 160, won some good fights there. Anyone who faced Hagler's opponents would have their hands full imo
     
  10. christpuncher

    christpuncher Active Member banned Full Member

    699
    529
    Jul 31, 2019
    I'd favour McCallum over them all except Leonard who could have outsped him. Mugabi would be a tough one but I'd favour him to get through it. He outclasses Sibson and most of the rest.
     
  11. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,224
    Mar 7, 2012
    What does going 15 rounds with Mannion tell us?

    How can you say that he’s so overrated and then say that Mugabi would have stopped him?

    Mugabi never beat a top level fighter in his entire career.

    7 rounds with Hagler? Really? That’s a bold statement.
     
    JohnThomas1 likes this.
  12. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,224
    Mar 7, 2012
    Mike was never stopped in 55 fights, where he ended his career at CW at 40 years old.

    A Duran fight would have been a tactical fight, with Mike being significantly bigger. It would have been highly unlikely that Duran would have stopped him.
     
    HolDat likes this.
  13. William Walker

    William Walker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,901
    9,151
    Apr 9, 2020
    I don't think Hearns would beat McCallum, who was a lot tougher than Hearns. Duran might be able to beat McCallum, and maybe Leonard. Nobody else stands a chance though. I do wonder how "the Beast" would do though.
     
  14. The Morlocks

    The Morlocks Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,717
    8,944
    Nov 21, 2009
    Mugabi vs Hagler and pre Hagler destroyed every ranked middleweight he fought. After Hagler he never cared again. I would take Pre and Hagler Mugabi over Hearns and Leonard by KO
     
    William Walker likes this.
  15. The Morlocks

    The Morlocks Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,717
    8,944
    Nov 21, 2009
    GREAT FIGHTERS STOP other fighters. McCallum OVERRATED!