You are on crack, if you think Castillo was a harder fight than most of Calzaghe's fights, what has Castillo done at 140? Hatton is a lucky two time division champion, he just beat "The Next Winky Wright"
And thats your basis for Hatton having a better resume than Joe. 1 fight against a semi retired fighter. Seriously **** off you pathetic child.Its the same atypical line with all you Hatton drones. Your not capable of debating a point with out your fanboyist ways preventing you from making crude remarks. Another clown to add to the ignore list.
No, Tszyu P4P #2. That's a fact. Whether he had been inactive or past his best is irrelevant. He was the second best fight in the world - Fact. And Castillo was just out of the P4P ratings. Prior to the Hatton loss, he hadn't lost a decisive, uncontroversial fight in 4 years. Yeah, Mayweather beat Hatton cleanly. However, I'm not desputing that. Scurla said Calzaghe had faced better opponents, when he clearly hadn't. Hatton had more belts, was also undefeated, beat better opponents and only lost to the best fighter on the generation. Calzaghe has a poor resumebut a long reign. If they both retired now, Hatton would be looked upon better in the future.
Are you tired of being "schooled" by me? You're pathetic. Every time I've seen you post about Hatton, I've ripped your weak argument to pieces. You always came back with some personal insults, like a weak, little *****. **** you. I'm glad you won't read them, because it means you won't be able to reply to me with your nonsense. I'm bored of constantly "schooling" you. (I posted this at you, because I doubt you will add me to your ignore list, and also for everyone else to see what a ***** you are)
I think more people picked Castillo to beat Hatton, than Kessler to beat Calzaghe. I remember a lot of people saying Castillo would win, actually. The main basis for the argument was Castillo's body attacks. I remember Freddy, probably Castillo's biggest fan on here, saying he thought he'd win, which is saying something. Who, aside from the Dane's, were saying Kessler would win? Not many at all. It could be down to Castillo being more well known than Kessler though, but I definetly think the Castillo/Hatton fight had more diverse opinions. I think what you're saying is right in hindsight. after a one-sided 4 rounds, it looks like Castillo was no threat. In comparison, Kessler showed good skills against a great opponent. But before each fight? I think more people pick Castillo than Kessler.
Kessler brought a lot to the table at SMW, Castillo brought a name and reoputation but nothing at LWW, the win over Castillo gave Hatton false pretencies how good he was to a point where he even underestimated Mayweather.
http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=3JfcJZPST5M Here is Witter on National TV saying he will fight Hatton for free. http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=XXBEn9O8GyQ&feature=related Hatton defending difficult Witter questions. BBC mentioned in the Homecoming PC no Witter question were allowed.
Regardless of the amount Witter would get paid for a fight with Hatton, if the fight does happen, he's going to make a load of additional money because his face is out there. Without Hatton, nobody cares about Witter. he draws a few housand local fans to his world title fights. He has no mainstream recognition, If he fights Hatton for free, he'll end up making more money without that payday in he rest of his career, than he would have done without fighting Hatton. If Hatton doesn't want to give him a payday, it's not just about their fight. Fighting Hatton would make Witter a big name, which therefore would make him a lot more money.
Why has Hatton got such a problem with Witter making $$$. And don't give no BS about Witter calling him out. He's entitled to call him out being ranked #2 (though in reality he is already #1).
this fight just has to happen and with witter holding the wbc title, it gives the fight an extra sparkle. i hope it happens!!!!