Witter Vs Lazcano

Witter decides to box rather than brawl like Hatton, he's too fast, too difficult and wins on points.

 

Funnily enough, I was wondering who wins Hatton vs Bradley.

I reckon it's a toss up.

 

Witter wins a ridiculously boring close points decision.

 

How many Bradley fights have you seen?

I've only seen him against Witter which is clearly no basis at all to judge how he might do against Hatton.

 

One.

I saw that he has all-round skills, can hit and doesn't have an obvious weakness, which puts him in a league of his own at 140.

"Arf, are you saying he beats Super Ricky then?"

No, I'm saying I wonder how he'd do against him.

 

It would probably go to points and be close decision either way. I'd lean toward Lazcano.

 

He didn't have any obvious weaknesses against the problems posed by Witter, fair enough. I think we can agree though that was not a searching test of every aspect of him as a fighter.

Too early to draw any firm conclusions imo (so I've no idea whether a fight with Hatton would be a 'toss up). I'd quite like to see Bradley v Torres while Hatton is taking on Maliganaggi. Two title unifications.

 

Witter by KO.

 

Witter doesn't have that kind of power.

 

Witter undoubtly has one punch KO power.:hi:

 

Against a lower level of competition he does. Who has he knocked out that I should be impressed by? Harris?

 

Doesn't matter who he fought, he's proven to have one punch knockout power and Is the only fighter to drop N'dou twice. Stopping 15 fighters In a row Is Impressive as well.

The Harris fight was Witter at his best, that Witter would KO Hatton with the counter left hooks Hatton's open to.

 

Witter by KO or winning every round. Actually Lazcanno may take a couple of rounds as Witter tires