Wlad: 247 - Peter: 241 Weigh In Pics

are you actually mentally ******ed? cos if so i'll lay off a little...feelin a bit sorry for your evident lack of mental faculties about now....

i dont consider holy great for beating mike...YOU said that Holy was a cruiser...i said the point is moot because he beat mike anyway.

<rolls eyes>

it's also not proof of tysons greatness.

he was a legit hw but he was not world class.

 

right, better take the easier route as in sticking to your opinion, covering your ears shouting loudly to anyone who disagrees with you as opposed to explaining why, right?? thats just weak man.

 

no-one is comparing it to vlads!?!?!?

ANYwhere on this thread!!!

 

Still a nasty little twerp, I see. I must have touched a nerve. After all, it does take a great deal of fanaticism to keep harping on and on about anyone, never mind two boxers you don't know, for years on end on the Internet. Over an ex-wife, maybe I could see that kind of fanaticism. But the Klitschkos?

I have to wonder at the kind of mindset that takes.

 

I knew wlad was gay. Look at him looking at Peter's ass in that pic. He even has a smile on his face.

 

Very good. Yes, and amongst boxing fans, this affliction is particularly acute, to the point where the sport is suffering because of it.

 

You avoid the issue: whether or not Wlad's resume is weak has zero to do with whether or not Tyson's is also weak. Tyson's resume can stand or fall on its own. And my opinion is that his resume is on the weak side. If you don't agree, fine, but talking about Wlad isn't going to change anything. Drop the obsession for a moment.

 

oh wow looks like someone found a thesaurus! you're grammar was that of a six tear olds now you wanna type like you're in college, i appreciate the effort but quite frankly its pointless. now you just sound like an idiot trying to sound intellectual. man, that plan back fired huh?

its because he was a cruiser idiot, im not making this stuff up. he was a cruiser before he campaigned at HW. and the whole point of me bringing up holys campaign at cruiser was to counter your "blown up lhw" argument. so again, you're contradicting yourself and you dont even notice it, and suprisingly you continue to do so.

there's an emoticon for that, too much of a simpleton to use that as well?

so being the first man to beat larry holmes isnt a first class HW? wow, now ive seriously heard everything.

 

oh wow, really? so responding to someones opinion with my own is obsession? does everything come across as obsessive to you? im merely talking about the topic at hand which someone has started, how exactly am i being obsessive? its nothing more than a debate. so do you consider ALL boxing fans as fanatical fanboys since we talk about fighters we like and we dont like? i think a better question is what kind of mindset does it take for an individual to come to such conclusions in situations where its incalled for? might wanna re-evaluate yourself on that one buddy.

 

Peter has lost his mind wearing that MMA shirt. They both would get there ass kicked in MMA. Wlad would not last 30 seconds.

 

Brock Lesnar would not last one boxing round with either Klitschko.

 

so is this how you handle debates? by telling the person you're arguing with is an obsessed loon? despite of the fact im merely responding to a topic which was started by another individual? its not that im obsessed, this is just a week method to weasel yourself out of a situation you put yourself in. if you dont wanna debate or counteract any of my arguments thats fine, but dont be a dope and try to mask your shortcomings with a bunch of personal insults. that just shows nothing but weakness on your behalf, whatever rut you're going through in your personal life right now just leave it there and actually TRY to talk boxing.

 

I only mentioned Tyson in reference to the ideology that many current fans of the sport have today that a great champion is someone who comes in and KTFO of his opponent in one round. That's not boxing, that's brawling. Tyson was a great puncher, but lets face it, he didn't exactly fight the toughest competition on his way up the ladder. And when he finally fought guys that could take a punch, he struggled or lost. That's all. People forget that boxing has two sides: offense and defense. The idea is to hit and not be hit. Too many people discredit Wladimir for having a defense. That's like saying the N.O. Saints suck because their defense doesn't let the other team score. Think about it.

 

If anything, you are even crazier now than you used to be.

I'm heading over to Dan Rafael's boxing chat. You can keep barking if you like.:hi:

 

heading over to another boxing site to call other people obsessive loons and fanatical fanboys? lol what a life you live.