Wlad getting closer to top 10 ATG status?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by kmcc505, Jun 20, 2009.


  1. riggers

    riggers Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,218
    3
    Aug 14, 2008
    Who do the Wlad fans feel is his greatest victory ?
     
  2. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    Everyone has Walcott beating Louis and call it a robbery, Wlad just doesnt have a win on the level of a Louis or Charles, Wlad does have more longevity at the top
     
  3. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005



    John Garfield who was live at ringside called it an outrageous robbery. Even YOU admitted walcott won the fight, so if you dont give walcott credit your a hypocrite. Walcotts victory over louis in 1947 is by far better than any win Wlad has.


    Byrd is not that good, and byrd was far past his prime the 2nd time. Walcott has much better wins, and make a separate thread if youd like.


    How did Charles began to slip a little? Charles wasa 29 year old Heavyweight Champion who had not lost in THREE YEARS and his last 25 pro bouts.....Charles was not only on the best winning streak of his career but the champion. Walcott dethroned him with 1 punch. Charles was at/near his prime....Wlad has NEVER beat a heavyweight on the level of Ezzard Charles.

    1. You are wrong. Walcott staggered charles numerous times in the 2nd fight. The fight was alot closer than the scorecards indicate

    2. The 3rd Walcott-Charles fight took place ONLY 4 months after the 2nd charles fight, so are you telling me Charles suddenly aged in only a 4 month span?



    Walcotts wins over Louis, Ray 2x, Johnson, Charles 2x, Murray, Bivins, Gomez, Baksi, Oma, Hoff, Sheppard 2x, Maxim 2x, Reddish ARE BY BY FAR better wins in both Quality and Quantity than Wladimirs best
    wins. Walcott had beaten 4 different Hall of famers? how many has wlad beaten?
     
  4. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    Honestly walcott has beaten better competition than wlad and its not even close. walcott holds the edge both in quality and quantity.

    Wlad has never beaten a heavyweight nowehre near the level of Joe Louis and Ezzard Charles.....

    Elmer Ray, lee Q Murray, Jimmy Bivins, and harold Jonnson rate over Ruslan Chagaev, Chris Bryd, Sam Peter, Calvin brock

    Even if we take the 2nd teir contenderrs both beat walcott has the edge

    Give Wlad some time...but hes got ways to go
     
  5. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    you mean the man with a detatched retina who was coming off a boxing lesson from sergei liakhovic? it was a clear win for sergie 116-111 in my book.
     
  6. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,144
    13,100
    Jan 4, 2008
    His losses are always going to make it tough for him too squeeze into top 10, but let's wait and see. I have some other guys firmly in my top 10 or even top 5 with bad losses (Lewis being the prime example), so it should not be impossible.

    The sharpness of his straight punches are really a joy to watch. Very good footwork as well. But I like to see him win over a really good pressure fighter before I go overboard on him. Let's see what the Haye fight brings.
     
  7. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    91
    Nov 10, 2008
    workrate fitness and going to war
     
  8. la-califa

    la-califa Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,292
    53
    Jun 12, 2007
    Interesting Question? How many ATG or potentially future ATG has he defeated???
     
  9. spittle8

    spittle8 Dropping Fisticuffs Full Member

    1,046
    4
    Dec 13, 2008
    H2H?

    Frazier
    Bowe
    Wills
    Charles
    Norton
    Patterson
    Walcott

    I'm beginning to think he's much better than most give him credit for being. I believe that in 20 years he'll be a consensus top-15 HWY H2H and will be venerated on a similar level to Lewis. I bet if Wlad fought 100 years ago he'd be spoken of today as some kind of myth. He's a very sound fighter with tremendous tools, he just crumbles on the inside against pressure sometimes, and he used to gas and panic. I think he has the ability to beat any heavyweight in history, I'd probably favor him against all but 10 or 15 fighters in history. On his best night.
     
  10. Vanboxingfan

    Vanboxingfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,591
    255
    Feb 5, 2005

    If he starts getting guys out of there the way Lewis got ride of Golota, Ruddock, and Grant you're probably right, he could conceivably crack the top 10, but unless his wins become explosive then I think he'll end up between 11-20 on most peoples list.
     
  11. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    I'd agree with that last post....

    But then again, the level of opposition available barring his brother is painfully bad.
     
  12. barneyrub

    barneyrub Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,077
    3
    Aug 2, 2004
    Most of those are pointless WBO title defences when Lewis was champion that shouldnt really count. Not unless you also want to say that herbie hide is 2 the time world heavyweight champion and the youngest champ ever, not Tyson!

    Wlad fought for that belt so as to stay out of the rankings for the real belts so as not to have to fight Lewis.

    When Tyson was champ Damiani was the world champion! Thats how bogus the WBO title is.