Wlad Has an Incredible Record Quailty Wise

WELL DONE:good:good

 

atsch

 

:good:good. Good post

 

Wlad's long term, über-dominance, together with his brother, means that most HWs who campaigned in his day did not have a chance to have HOF careers, hence it is difficult for him to rack up HOF scalps.

Nevertheless, when Chris Byrd gets inducted, Wlad will have the same number of HOF Heavyweight scalps as Mike Tyson, Sonny Liston or Joe Frazier. :yep

 

Wake me when Chris Byrd gets into the HOF....

 

And BTW - Mike Tyson, Sonny Liston and Joe Frazier all beat LEGITMATE HW champions to win their title.

Exactly WHO has Klitschko ever beaten?

 

Why do you always ask that quiestion?
Can't you read like the rest of users on this forum?

 

That's not what you were banging on about, the HOF victories. That's a different question.

To answer your original question (again), when Chris Byrd gets inducted, Wlad will have the same number of HOF Heavyweight scalps as Mike Tyson, Sonny Liston or Joe Frazier.

Already answered.

But once again, for the slow...

 

Every deserving, top heavyweight IN THE WORLD..... For a DECADE.
Oh, then there was a couple of reasonably respectable belts and wins before the decade run.
Ah, there was also that whole GOLD MEDAL thing in'96.

Care to list your accomplishments? Lol

 

The top tier of his opposition is very weak compared to the best HW's in history of whom Wladimir will be compared with.

 

perhaps you'd like to list YOUR accomplishments compared to Muhammad Ali first.

exactly, Idiot argument.

 

because its yet to answered.

6 round sam puffing peter is not an answer, the guy isn't cut to fight for world titles, only subnational titles that require 6-8 round bouts.

 

having said that Byrd, Sultan, Haye and povetkins are acceptable HW crown defences. 4 and counting, plus throw in 2 duff ones that everyone does. that's 6 so far. still a way to go to just Tysons defence record yet.

 

No it's not an idiot argument. You spend your day trying to tear down the accomplishments of a exemplary boxer, you're a keyboard warrior that likely has never even boxing to a boxing gym.

I'm betting that you really haven't accomplished much, hence your need to go on the attack against a figure that achieved more by the time he was 25 then you probably will in your entire life. The butthurt in you is real.

 

lets assume that you are right in that I did spend my day doing that.

Dans not replying to me however. hes being asked to answer a question posed by someone else. So YOU are already wrong to claim what you just did,

besides that, he is still using " what have you accomplished" to avoid a question.
doubly wrong mate, whilst claiming you are entirely right.

furthermore, I've been fair enough to highlight wlads acceptable defences. so you are actually wrong in the initial assumption that I am always dissing wlad - clearly I am not.

treble flop, mate.