Wlad hasn't lost a round in 3 and a half years...

Id say the 80's for sure. 50's are discussable. The 30's id have to rehash. How about the 90's and 70's?

 

I remember calling that Wlad would not lose for 4-5 years and that was just over ten years ago...I was laughed at. What people didn't understand was not that I'm not some kind of psychic, I was simply looking at his current comp and possible future comp and comparing their talent to his advantages. My call would have actually been longer if I could foresee that the future ranks would have not have been much different. My point is, it should not be possible to do that unless there is a glaring and obvious advantageous situation at hand...especially when I could see that Wlad is not some kind of great athlete with tremendous movement, speed, timing etc.

 

How were the 80s blessed with depth skillwise. You'd have 1 guy at the top who was highly skilled (holmes, later tyson), and beneath that you had nothing much. Guys with 15 fights got title shots, got blown out of the water, then you never saw them again. If you think today is bad then how on earth can you list the 80s HW scene as "skilled"?

 

Wlad is a phoney , bogus champ.

Nick Valeuv would of been undefeated if he was allowed do the things Wlad does.

 

1980's was one of the best HW Era's. Stop parroting a silly misconception.

 

if he fought in the 80's first old ass holmes holmes would have schooled and embarrassed him, make him trip over his own feet, then tyson would have broken his jaw in 3 different places. next w 2 sure losses on his record he could have fought lewis in the 90's and been knocked into retirement. tua, rahman, golota, frans botha, and countless # of others all beat a green klitschko from 1996-2004 :hi:

 

Best HW in the world. And i love how he own the haters, esp Dino. Dino is so mad, that he has no life left .... Wlad own him everytime.
The most fun part was when he say Pulev will school him, how good Pulev was, how Wlad cant handle Pulev, how Pulev will outbox him and destroy him and after Wlad destroying him, Dino was talking what a bum Pulev is.

 

Are we talking about the most overrated heavyweight in recent memory fat ass Tua? The same Tua who got outboxed by numerous fighters levels below Wlad before getting one of his late lucky punch stoppages?

The Golota who's best win is Danell Nicholson and who lost against Grant? That Golota?

The same Botha Wlad beat?

Rahman? He had a punchers chance but 9 times out of 10 both Lewis and Wlad beat him.

Get to fcuk with your s hitty post you pen****.

 

yes and we're talking about all these fighters fighting a green wlad the same wlad that gktfo by a golf playing journeymen and ross purity. :deal

 

Because he had a good code of sportsmanship and fought within the rules.

 

But "green" Wlad had already beaten Botha.

Plus Golota was getting his **** pushed in by Michael Grant and was recording victories over such dangerous opponents like Brian Nix, Marcus Rhode etc.

Tua's overated as hell not even going to talk regarding his resume.

 

You will never give up will you.

Just curious who's your next man to take down Wlad?

 

Claiming that Wlad is not a great athlete while questioning his movement, speed and timing tips your hand. The weak era agruement fits your views because it is the perfect strawman arguement that will always support how you view Wlad's skill set.

It basically makes any further logical discourse on the subject futile.

 

This proves how weak the division nowadays a Puritty victim can be champion.

 

Well... you obviously have no idea what you're talking about.

I'm not a gambling man, but I'm willing to bet you're one of the butthurt black power loses who just can't stand the fact that the best ever heavyweight is a white European