Does he really...He elected to fight a total bum in barett instead of Toney or Rahman. now, he backs out of the wladi fight. That does not look very confident to me. he knows that his questionable chin can betray him.
Would he have gotten any credit for beating Rahman? I'm not saying Haye could/would beat Wlad but I don't doubt for a second that he believes he can. He was happy to fight the best at Cruiserweight and i'm sure it'll be the same at Heavyweight.
Bingo. :good It would have also been the same story for Toney. If Haye had gone down that route he probably would have been nailed to the cross for not fighting Barrett who had just destroyed Tye Feilds. :deal The fact remains that Rahman is a few years removed from his best and was fighting journeymen since losing his title to Maskaev. Toney on the other hand hadn't won a fight since beating Guinn in 2005. But of course, Haye wouldn't have had ANY **** flung at him for fighting these guys. :rofl He's only had two fights at heavyweight so lets see what happens from here on in. He is looking to fight the best and that's all you can ask from a contender. :good
Wlad is the Champ, Haye nothing more than a contender. Wlad had make deals with other boxers without problems. So what´s David Haye´s problem to sign the contract? He is talking to fight the best. That is a difference. If Haye wants this fight, he should sign the contract.
It's really pointless debating this issue with you because in all fairness you are a terrible poster. :-( You just spout the same repetitive nonsense in every single post and ignore the goddamn facts and fail to listen to both sides of the story. atsch There was no contract because terms were never agreed. :deal Haye has also agreed fights in the past so perhaps the problem is with Wlad - but of course that's not biased on my part now is it - not if we play by your rules. Haye talks about fighting the best?? :rofl Shall we just ignore his CW days where he fought good fighters after only a handful of fights and fought in the Lion's Den to capture world titles??? :think Clown. :blood
Dude shut your ****ing gob up! atsch Haye's fight was set in the UK. Do you think Toney or Hassim "The Pebble" Rahman would have gone to London to fight Haye? :roll: It's obvious that Barratt was the only mother ****er who would take the fight.
Beating Rahman or Toney would have proved a lot more than beating a shot bum who was knocked out in 2 by Cliff couser. I am not even gonna start arguing with you about that, becuase this is too obvious. Haye has a lot to prove righ now.Backing out of fights with Toney, Rahman and Wladi. He repeatedly claimed he wanted to fight Wladi and Rahman and then when the opportunity came, he backed out. And remember, Haye has only beat Mormeck so far.
Definitely, Rahman was not afraid to travel to Germany to face Wladi. It is all about the money. Haye can still fight Toney now, so we will see what happens...
Of course Wlad had no problems dealing with the other guy's. You knwo why? Because those other bum's bought sweet **** all to the table. :rofl Haye on the other hand is one of the biggest and most dangerous tests of Wlads career and a true world champion. unlike all those other bum's and Wlad himslef.
My God - you really are a ****ing tool. A shot bum? Barrett had just starched Fields and was a credible opponent - one which Wlad had already fought. I suppose Rahman and Toney are still in their primes. :roll: Oh, and remind me what Barrett did to Couser in the REMATCH?? :deal Haye has only beat Mormeck? :rofl It's just not worth the effort trying to debate with a complete ****ing simpleton. :hi:
The Toney who most people thought was soundly beaten by Oquendo? The Toney who hasn't won a fight since Guinn in 2005? That Toney? :think
Why not James Toney? Great fight for the US. And than Haye can see where the $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ are going. Haye is a contender not a world champion.
I've just answered that frickin question. If you are arguing that Haye has done nothing at heavyweight, what has Toney done since beating Guinn? :deal