Wlad is already a greater champion than Mike Tyson.

Huh? Wlad already a greater champion than Mike Tyson?

Mike Tyson was an undefeated undisputed champion and held several insane records such as youngest champion and top PPV records. In his reign he would be announced as "Really needing no introduction around the world. The Youngest...Undefeated...Undisputed champion of the world".

When did any of the Klit-bros ever achieve that?
Neither of them broke any of Tysons record. Neither of them were undefeated champion and neither of them are undisputed champion (unless you want to join the Klit-bros achievement together).

Fans like these embarrass the Klitscho bros and make it harder for them to get accepted.

 

ohhhh ya:good

 

tyson would have knocked out all of wlad opponents.......including corrie sanders/brewster and sparring partner purritty...........HONESTLY THE DOUGLAS OF TOKYO WOULD HAVE BEATEN WLAD.:smoke

 

tyson never lost a round to pinky/holmes nor biggs......

 

AGRRED BRO.................U GUYS R ******ED MAN...........TYSON IN HIS PRIME WASNT LAMON BREWSTER EITHER:scaredas:

 

Prime Tyson Would Kill the 2 Boring Klitschko Brothers No Doubt !!!

 

Sorry, but I don't give a rat's ass about accomplishments in this type of comparison. Neither fighter dominated a great class, but Mike did beat the better fighters, and did so FAR more emphatically. I'm just not impressed with what Wlad's doing in such a mediocre division. Add to that I don't think he sees the 5th round against a prime Mike and I think it's safe to say I've voiced my opinion on the matter.

 

H2H Tyson's greater and will always be (Wlad has done well not losing in a while but he's got a big size advantage against anyone decent he has beaten. compare that to tyson -- most often at a size disadvantage, beat moderately better comp overall in a much more impressive fashion IMO).

In terms of a better career, Wlad will likely soon overtake Tyson.

 

Greater champion? I don't think so. If you factor in all that makes a champion, dominance, popularity, and era I think Tyson is better hands down.

 

Basically...

Tyson, in his prime, fighting the Wlad of today, who is in his prime, would prob do a # ala Corey Sanders style on him. It would be very exciting, this fight. Its even cool to just imaginning it happening.

Tyson by brutal KO.

 

Holmes was well past it and so was Spinks. Wlad did not make his name beating up on X names such as Bowe, Holyfield, or Tyson.

Also, Wlad should have four belts WBA, IBF, IBO and WBO. The WBA pulled out.

Tyson was a bully. He never got off the deck to win a match, and never avenged a loss.

 

They are close on an all time greatest list but Tyson is still higher and that's coming from a big fan of Klitschko.

The main reason is that Tyson is the youngest HW champion of all time & he was undisputed. Wlad still working on that one and in time he may be 100% undisputed, but he'll never be the youngest for obvious reasons. If WK can unify all the belts & defend successfully for another 5 or so fights he'd have a good argument.

 

vlad needs a few more years at the top with some impressive wins not public sparring sessions and he may get compared with some all time greats but h2h they all beat him the only difference is tyson eats his children as well as ko`s him in 5

 

im sorry has he unified a division yet ****o?:nono