Wlad is lennox lewis 2.0

not in a million years, lewis has beaten a far higher lvel of competion than wlad even if he beats those names. Some people on here have no sense of realism.

 

He seems to get hit plenty 'cause his arse keeps hitting the canvas. Or is that the wind blowing him over?

 

Old Tyson, Holyfield and Golota? Tucker, Bruno..

 

Really?:rofl

[url]http://www.boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_id=7035&cat=boxer[/url]

 

i would fancy some of them to beat wlad, also half of wlads opponents are either past it or not worth fighting s calling tyson old, when on eof wlads better wins is an old ray mercer is laughable.

 

Hmm, maybe Tyson in his prime...i dunno

 

or maybe holyfield, bruno would have a punchers chance as would old tyson

 

Punchers chance is almost every one against everyone. If lewis would been fight 100 fight against average fighter he would been probably ko'ed a couple times.:deal Thats boxing..

 

Is that supposed to address the point at all?

 

not really lewis fought alot of big punchers and lwad hasn't yet he has been down alot more times. If bruno landed anything decent of wlad he would be gone. I think the 2008 wlad would do alot better but 2002-2004 would probably lose to old tyson and bruno by tko.

 

Agree, wlad is now in his prime. Not excuses if he lost again. Wlad have already 53 fights and thats alot to nowadays fighter.

Bruno can get punch in, but probably wlad get first shot.

 

Agree. But Lewis with Fritz Sdunek in the corner after his loss to McCall would have been KO´ed and would never been the fighter Lewis was.

 

I agree to some extent but the when did wlad ever wreck anyone like ruddock pre prime.

 

Wow, you never saw the Austin fight? :rofl

 

you mean THE RAY AUSTIN, best fighter since joe louis