Wlad is not a top 20 HW, he has never beaten anyone of significance

Larry Holmes is considered a top 5 guy, and I'd say 75% of his defenses were against the undeserving. Who has been out there for Vlad to fight? He hasn't ducked anyone. And I'm not a fan of his....I just think objectively he's been dominant and mopped the floor with everyone.

 

Your 100% spot on in regard to Wlad.

I disagree with your assessment of Jersey Joe, but at least you back up your argument with some background info :good

 

Maybe the Klitschko nut huggers can tell us exactly WHO is the significant HW that Wlad [or Vitali] has beaten.

I can't wait to hear this...

 

Of course he isn't, cuz Koman said so..ffs, get a life and quit loving to hate

 

I do feel I don't give a fair shake of the stick sometimes but when all is said and done if was at top of the tree for a very short time. Still a great fighter without doubt.

 

You've made excuses and you've done a lot of apologizing.

What you haven't done is answer the question; what significant HW has Wlad or Vitali beat?

PS: Wasn't Wlad something like 40-1 when he fought Sanders and wasn't he also a belt holder? Please explain who Wlad was NOT in his prime during the Sanders and Brewster fights? I can't wait to hear this....

 

Because no matter who they name, you will just post "CANS, OLD MEN, NO HOPERS..BLAH BLAH, BLAH!" I can do the same thing for any fighter you cherish..oh, you don't like boxing. Nevermind.

Let go of the hatred in you soul, feel your heart with the love of the god before its late. God doesn't have a skintone as he is a glowing orb, I think a lessen can be learned from this.

 

by my reckoning here is Wlad's record against "significant HW's"


Wladimir Klitschko 17-2-0 (13)

Jackson, Barret, Byrd (x2), Jefferson, Mercer, McCline, Sanders, Brewster (x2), Peter (x2), Brock, Ibragimov, Thompson, Rahman, Chagaev, Chambers, Haye (16.)


He was in his prime for the Brewster fight, he just lost to the better man on the night. He later avenged this defeat. His record from the Brewster defeat on is pretty good considering the rankings of the opponents at the time: Peter, Byrd, Brock, Brewster, Ibragimov, Thompson, Rahman, Chagaev, Chambers, Peter, Haye. that's 11 world rated fights over the last 6 years against 7 former, current or future belt holders. Each of them can be classed as significant.

Since the first Peter fight, anyone bar Austin can be classed as "significant"

 

Sorry but there is not one significant HW on that list.

Please try again...

 

Please answer the question; what significant HW has Wlad or Vitali beat?

 

CANS, OLD MEN, CRUISERWEIGHTS, FATTIES, BUMS, NO HOPERS, HOMOSEXUALS, WOMEN PRETENDING TO BE MEN, WEAK BLACKMEN, ..etc..

 

The quick answer is no one.

Vitali has lost vs the two best fighters he has ever faced yet is billed as a "H2H monster" for beating up a fat Sam Peter.

 

it's ok I forgive you.

How do you define significant? maybe you're grasp of English isn't strong but for me any ranked opponent and or title holder is significant.

 

this komanstupid****600 doesnt even reply to his own threads...he makes one stupid ass thread topic and disappears....probably because he is using his neighbors computer or public library