Wlad is not a top 20 HW, he has never beaten anyone of significance

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Koman600, Sep 25, 2011.


  1. Blake Rayne

    Blake Rayne Fat Cuban Aficianado Full Member

    5,373
    11
    Mar 26, 2011
    :lol::lol::lol:

    YOU DUMB *******. You can't even spell IQ.

    You didn't specify Fahrenheit and considering scientists generally use Celsius or Kelvin when discussing temperature I just assumed a man as intelligent as yourself would think likewise. Guess I was wrong.

    Also since I was able to absorb your post and give you a rational answer my part is done.

    Now answer my question.

    Forgot this thread was still going.
     
  2. zfc

    zfc Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,367
    91
    May 1, 2009
    David Haye has never been knocked out.

    Wlad couldn`t knock him out either.
     
  3. Son of Gaul

    Son of Gaul Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,628
    30
    Feb 16, 2010
    While I agree that he's still got some things left to accomplish before being considered an ATG, we need to give him credit for beating Haye. In a weak era like this, he just needs to keep winning. With that said, he'll need to fight Helenius and Povetkin before everything is said and done.
     
  4. Son of Gaul

    Son of Gaul Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,628
    30
    Feb 16, 2010
    I've been nothing but positive about Wlad's legacy but '67-'71 Frazier would have him pissing blood for weeks.
     
  5. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,173
    Sep 15, 2009
    Wlad is top 20.

    Egyptians were white.

    Pyramids serve no practical purpose.

    Naysayer is a tool.
     
  6. Nay_Sayer

    Nay_Sayer On Rick James Status banned Full Member

    15,707
    503
    May 25, 2009
    Source please.
     
  7. Nay_Sayer

    Nay_Sayer On Rick James Status banned Full Member

    15,707
    503
    May 25, 2009
    I've already made my point.

    As to your assertion that Ancient Egypt's neighbors could have built Pyramids, I'm still waiting for your evidence.

    And BTW: Mesoamerican Pyramids have absolutely *nothing* to do with Ancient Egypt's neighbors.
     
  8. Nay_Sayer

    Nay_Sayer On Rick James Status banned Full Member

    15,707
    503
    May 25, 2009
    And why do you keep contradicting yourself?
     
  9. Nay_Sayer

    Nay_Sayer On Rick James Status banned Full Member

    15,707
    503
    May 25, 2009
    This is a very interesting quote from Hawas. Notice how he doesn't tell you exactly what the Ancient Egyptians actually were.

    Maybe you'd like to tell us?
     
  10. Nay_Sayer

    Nay_Sayer On Rick James Status banned Full Member

    15,707
    503
    May 25, 2009
    Source please.
     
  11. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,036
    Jun 30, 2005
    You haven't. I've already explained why above. If you want to show that Egypt was more advanced than its neighbors, you need to distinguish its pyramids from the pyramids of the (more primitive) Mesoamerican civilizations.

    I already cited Babylonian engineering projects several posts back...Unless you think that the only proof that a civilization can build Egyptian-style pyramids is actually building Egyptian-style pyramids. Is that seriously your argument?

    Actually, the connection is obvious.

    Egypt's neighbors = primitive copper- and bronze-age civilizations.

    Mesoamericans = even more primitive copper-age civilizations that built pyramids.


    So if the Mesoamericans could do it, the Sumerians and Babylonians presumably could as well.
     
  12. Undisputed520

    Undisputed520 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,512
    2
    May 20, 2008
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ztVMib1T4T4[/ame]
     
  13. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,036
    Jun 30, 2005
    :huh

    The post you quoted with the "Black Pharaohs" refers to the Kushite dynasty, which was clearly black. They were foreign invaders just like the Hyksos.
     
  14. Nay_Sayer

    Nay_Sayer On Rick James Status banned Full Member

    15,707
    503
    May 25, 2009
    I've already made my point with regard to the different classifications of Pyramids. Mesoamerican Pyramids are "Step Pyramids". Giza are "True Pyramids". The "True Pyramid" came later in the evolution of Pyramid design. If you have a problem with Mesoamerican Pyramids being classified as "Step Pyramids" then you need to make your case for a different classification.


    Please cite again.


    Speculation on your part. Let's see you provide some evidence to support the above assertion.
     
  15. Nay_Sayer

    Nay_Sayer On Rick James Status banned Full Member

    15,707
    503
    May 25, 2009
    Source please.