Wlad is simply a top athlete effective in his comfort zone. Vitali is a phenomenon

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BigBone, Oct 18, 2010.


  1. WiDDoW_MaKeR

    WiDDoW_MaKeR ESB Hall of Fame Member Full Member

    37,427
    88
    Jul 19, 2004
    I read it.... and I definitely don't agree with it.

    Tell me... if Wlad's opponents see his punches coming, and not Vitali's.... then why does Wlad knock more people out clean? Wlad does not only work in straight lines, and his punching arsenal is better than Vitali's. Vitali might throw from more awkward angles, but Wlad has a better jab, straight right, and left hook. Also, Wlad's footwork/mobility is absolutely insane for a fighter of his size. Better than ANY fighter his size, ever. It is his great footwork along with his great jab that allows him to control the distance of the fight. It isn't that Wlad can "only" fight at this distance. It's that Wlad is great enough to force everyone to fight at his preferred distance. That's called ring generalship. Wlad's ring IQ is amazing. The man hardly ever takes a clean punch, while he completely dismantles his opponents. Wlad controls the distance, timing, and tempo of his fights. It takes much more than just a great athlete to fight like that.

    If Vitali could fight like Wlad, he would. Vitali is great, and has his own set of great attributes. I agree that they are DEFINITELY not the same type of fighter. If you look at Wlad's earlier career... he fought A LOT more like Vitali does.

    Wlad could fight like Vitali if he chose to do so... Vitali could not fight like Wlad.

    Wlad could take a lot of steam and power off of his shots, and punch from multiple angles all night too. They are called arm punches. Vitali throws arm punches 95% of the time. It is very effective for Vitali, and he puts more snap on his punches when he wants to. The point is that they are just different styles that each of them use... because it works best with their attributes. Vitali can't move like Wlad, so he has to use this style. Vitali has to depend solely on his height, and ability to anticipate punches coming so he can lean back and away from them.
     
  2. HENDO

    HENDO Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,075
    6
    Mar 20, 2010
    Bla bla bla....

    Chambers, used up Peter that previously received that ass whuppin of his life by Vitali and put Wlad down 3 times, Chagaev, Ibriganov...

    Corrie Sanders, Lamont Brewster Ross Purity
     
  3. WiDDoW_MaKeR

    WiDDoW_MaKeR ESB Hall of Fame Member Full Member

    37,427
    88
    Jul 19, 2004
    Are you time traveling? Why are you talking about stuff that happened over 6 years ago? Are you unaware that some fighters learn and get better?
     
  4. BigBone

    BigBone Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,461
    1,723
    Nov 20, 2007
    If Wlad's mobility and coordination is so good, why did he have a dangerous and an ugly fight vs. Sam Peter with a lot of misses while Vitali, two hands down, chopped Sammy up without a clinch or getting tagged? If Wlad had the kind of variety you're talking about, you bet he would've boxed like his brother. Don't get me wrong, I think Wlad is very good, possibly better in his comfort zone than Vitali in any, but the big brother is the better natural talent, and better all-round, which would make a big difference in a historical tournament as much as it did in their actual careers.
     
  5. caneman

    caneman 100% AllNatural Xylocaine Full Member

    16,472
    1
    Aug 5, 2009
    Vitali and Wlad also both have phD (doctorate) degrees. Killer boxers and smart too.

    Do you Klit haters have that?

    :blah :lol:
     
  6. WiDDoW_MaKeR

    WiDDoW_MaKeR ESB Hall of Fame Member Full Member

    37,427
    88
    Jul 19, 2004
    Unless you have been under a rock since 2004... I think you would know that he clearly got better. Less exciting? Possibly... but definitely better.
     
  7. markclow

    markclow Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,368
    325
    Aug 23, 2005
    Vitali is a master at distance, no doubt.

    However I have never seen WK hit another fighter so many times without them falling over. WK would have got Briggs out of there.
     
  8. joeboxer

    joeboxer Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,079
    0
    Oct 30, 2005
    Vitali has a great ability to see an opponnents weight shift and lean backwards away from punches. He did this to briggs all night then countered with the left hook and overhand right.
     
  9. millertime1367

    millertime1367 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,777
    1
    Sep 11, 2008
    hard to compare based solely on Sam Peter, Sam was a different fighter in 2 if not all 3 of his fights with a Klitschko
     
  10. chico g

    chico g Let's watch some Sesame Street...lmao Full Member

    10,825
    12,197
    Oct 18, 2008
    Sam did come in alot more heavier in the Vitali fight. So you could argue that Wlad fought the more in shape mobile Peter. Makes you wonder if Vitali's win would have been more in impressive if Peter came in at 239 or 240...
     
  11. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,040
    35,145
    Jun 23, 2005
  12. BigBone

    BigBone Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,461
    1,723
    Nov 20, 2007
    Sam KO'd Maskaev and beat Toney (rematch) in the weight neighborhood he fought Vitali. If he came in lighter, Vitali's punishing punches would've caused greater damage, while I don't think he would've been much faster or more mobile. Conditioningwise it might have made a difference, but the whole point is that Vitali went in there hands down and dominated right away, while it took several rounds for Wlad to settle into his boxing mode, and frankly, Sam slowing down helped him a lot. Someone with great footspeed and angles would give Wlad a lot of fits but Vitali would deal with such fighter a lot easier, he's got a better feeling for the game. In fact, the way he can dominate right away reminds me of Hopkins.
     
  13. Davo

    Davo Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,977
    504
    May 27, 2010
    Good thread. Vitali has always been the better fighter in my eyes. It angers me that a great fighter like Vitali gets unfairly lumped in with his mark-ass brother. Wlad fights like a ***** and constantly tries to trash talk his bum opponents. Vitali is a warrior and a gentleman.

    I would even argue that he has a better resume than Wlad. Unlike Wlad, Vitali never lost badly to total bums and he has looked convincing in all of his wins. I don't see any of Wlad's competition as exceeding Vitali's so I really see no case for putting Wlad above his bro.
     
  14. Ponysmallhorse

    Ponysmallhorse Small but proud Full Member

    2,709
    6
    Mar 4, 2009
    Styles clash. Witaly fights at his best against forward pressure fighters like Sam peter or dany williams was. Wlads best category is boxers.
    Example:
    Tommy hearns is outstanding fighter who can outbox almost anyone in all divisions he fought. But he had problems with pressure fighters and could be steamrolled by physical force(hagler). At the same time Hagler struggles with SRL who adopted counter punching style. Hearns out boxed SRL both times(until he got stopped but this due to his chin).
    Witaly will always look better against like of Peter while Wlad has MUCH easier fights with likes of byrd, gomez etc.
     
  15. Heavyrighthand

    Heavyrighthand Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,149
    1,044
    Jan 29, 2005
    The original post clearly describles their difference that most didn't realize were so obvious.......me included. I see that the differences in styles is obviously much more than one being *tougher* and the other *more fluid and professional looking*.

    My input is that...................I think Wlad, with his sitting down on his powershots (and getting so many brutal KO wins) IS almost confined to a comfort zone, and straight line punching. He needs to reset and reassume his position each and every time, it seems, as that is where his power comes from; his body being positioned/his comfort zone. That is why a pressure fighter like Peter makes him very *out of sorts* and he has to constantly reset........But he's so talented and skilled at staying in his *comfort zone*, that you can't argue with his success............And its obviously effective as hell, regardless of what anyone may think of it.

    Vitali, on the other hand, does not sit down on his punches, and as a result, is able to land at angles that the oppoent is not expecting. The resulting arm punches are not thrown as hard, as he's throwing them *on the move*, and in many different positions................. but there are alot more of them, and they come from any and all angles and body positions Vitali happens to be in in any given exchange.

    Very impressive post by the thread starter. And very accurate as to how I see the differences in them, too.

    To summarize, Vitali is the superior overall fighter, exchanging hard powershots for a huge volume of *unexpected* and almost swarming armpunches from all angles that clubs his opponent into submission, whereas Wlad's comfort zone punches, which he sits down on, earns him more KO victories, makes him a bit more exciting to watch, as you know someone is getting KTFO.

    This is the interesting and insightful thread topic on the K Bros I've read in quite some time. Bravo.