WLAD K2 and their "offers"

I actually got slated for having a go at Vitali for fighting Sosnowski and of course in that slating they have a dig at Haye.

Its obvious from the first contract talks that K2 are coming the **** with these contract offers.

 

But give me one reason that Haye deserves 50-50 ??

I just dont get your view.Haye deserves not more then 70-30

 

Nonsense.

Haye Klitschko would bring in 1 million plus PPV buys in the UK, that's £15 million+. Add that to the the rest of the world shelling out Haye financially brings close to what either Klitschko brings.

Now that I've given my side how do you come to 70-30 again? This should be good....

 

Wlad is the champion and Haye is the contender

Wlad gets 60 and Haye gets 40 when did this change

Why does Wlad have to wine and dine this guy and bend over backwards to accomodate this guy if somebody publicly humiliated me and avoid a fight I'd take 60 why give this guy who pulled out once 50 50

 

Haye is only a belt holder and a coward , he deserves max 30-40% share

 

So well thought out and articulate, you've changed my mind with your fantastic deduction and reasoning powers, **** Haye!!!

 

Haye is a bigger draw than most of the oppos that the Klit's face.

he hold a portion of the HW title and has a genuine fan base that means $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

 

wlas has 2 belts and he has been champ far longer. haye has 1 paper belt only

 

Haye has a paper belt, what does that make Wlad titles.

the WBO title gets slagged off on here, yet the WBA is one of the oldest and now its a paper title.

what a mongtard.

 

Are you seriously trying to say Haye is anything more than a paper champ?

 

I remember the first talks with Haye and Wlad. If Haye would have won he would have had to fight Vitali. If he won that either Wald or Vitali again. This would have tied him up for 3 fights and most likely forced him to vacate a belt. Though the WBA would have prob just made him a "Super" Champ.

 

direct me to where I quoted that?