He's like a little poodle that was born with a drool reservoir instead of a brain. He will pitter patter after you until you whap him with a rolled up newspaper and then he'll scurry off yapping menacingly. You should see how he stopped dead in his tracks when he was dick riding Wilder, and I got him to big up Wach as an opponent. He realised too late that he was inflating one of Klitschko's wins ( ) and vanished like a stale fart in the wind ...
Peak wlad vs peak Holy, I'd take Wlad. But I'd take post prime Holy over pre prime Wlad. And probably by late stoppage. Holy too tough, experienced, and unpredictable for a green Wlad who lost to Ross the year before.
LMAO! Yeah he surrendered to me a long time ago when he created an alt to debate me. I handed him his lunch so much he was creating fake accounts. Some guys just love to hate.
What alt? Is this the new bottom you will stoop too in a desperate attempt to get back at me? All you win at is throwing insults , which basically equates to winning at being a loser. Show me this alt account?
There is no need to get back at you, I clown you at every turn. Where's the Wlad Jab thread? Oh.. right.
Wlad would win this as he was reaching the form he would be in when he defeated Byrd the first time. He wasn't as smart as he would be under Stewert but he had too much size, speed, power, and work rate for the aging Evander. Evander didn't have the physical tools to pull a Corrie Sanders and I can't see him at this point in his career pulling a Brewster and walking through hell to tire Wlad out.
Sounds reasonable to me. As much as I'd like holyfield to win, in this situation he more than likely loses. Now if it had been klitschko V holyfield 93.. Then it's holy that s getting the win.
Holyfield can score enough to win a decision. Move get in and get out. He fought like this against Lewis II.Also against Bowe II and Valuev, though that were different versions Wlad was stationary back then and unexperienced.
Yep he looked good against bowe in that fight. Seemed to hurt riddick a couple of occasions. And the holy that beat tyson would have a pretty good chance against wlad to
Valuev fight isn't fair to either man, Holyfield was ancient and Valuev and Wlad don't belong in the same sentence. Lewis 2 is relevant because it's 99 Holyfield and while he had good moments, he had to fight in spurts and take minutes and rounds off. Wlad was not stationary in 99, he was absurdly fast and mobile. Faster and more mobile then Lewis was in 99. Not a better overall fighter then Lewis, but his tools are just all wrong for the aging Evander. This content is protected
Based off what? Getting stopped by Ross Purrity? Lewis had an inside game to deal with Holyfield yet he still got the body beaten off him. Why do you think he wore the battle armour in the first fight? Holyfield was a great body hitter and that doesn't bode well for Wlad who harbours zero skills in close on top of poor stamina. Without the uppercut and inside game he's up the creek without a paddle. The whole sides of Wlads dome are open to Holys sharp counter left hooks. Wlad never faced nobody like that in his whole career , never mind during his first 3 years as a pro. Your pick is based on fanboysim mongoose , mine is based in reality.
Before Manny Stewart trained Wlad he was low hanging fruit for any fighter who could stay upright and punch. Holy would knock him out after surviving the first 5 rounds, making him fight