WLAD OR HOPKINS?! who is the better fighter today???

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by PH|LLA, Feb 13, 2008.


  1. mike464

    mike464 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,846
    0
    Sep 10, 2005
    :good
     
  2. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    1. Tarver? :rofl :lol:

    2. Winky is a great boxer but no serious power threat what-so-ever. He's a bit past it too.

    3. Austin was a Don King mandatory & Wlad disposed of him as easily as anyone could expect.

    5> You're a bias hater & you're not fooling anyone. :D
     
  3. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    Answer the questions in their 'stead funny man.
     
  4. Punisher33

    Punisher33 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,407
    8
    Oct 8, 2007
    Austin can be defined as a stiff, and it was quite obvious that Brewster was just a shell of his former self, which most posters have agreed with me on. Wlad hasnt fought a tough oppenent since Peter in September of 05, Brock has been exposed by Chambers as nothing special, and Bryd was well past his best coming into a fight against Wlad, considering his last 3 significant fights before that were all close with some controversal decisions against Golota, Mccline, and Oquendo. Wlads best wins our over Bryd in 2000 and Peter in 05, do you agree?
     
  5. Punisher33

    Punisher33 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,407
    8
    Oct 8, 2007
    How am I biased? I constantly say Wlads the best in the division, and Im not a delusional hater that goes around and says how Sultans going to beat Wlad and what not. I have even stated that my favorite fighter Sam Peter would only have a 35% chance of beating Wlad at the moment, just because I'm not a fan of Wlads, doesnt make me biased RUSKULL.
     
  6. mike464

    mike464 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,846
    0
    Sep 10, 2005
    Pardon?
     
  7. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    2/3 in favour of Wlad
     
  8. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    26,390
    2
    Mar 13, 2007
    How dare you people say WLAD?

    :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl

    Bhops is still a lot better fighter than Wlad even at the age of 43. Wlad is benefiting from a very weak division and enjoying a big physical advantage over his competition that's why he is on top . . . while Bhops have to dig deep into his fighting skills, expereince and smartness to win against younger opponents.

    If Wlad and Bhops belongs to the same division (OF COURSE with comparable physical attributes) . . . Bhops will easily smoke him.
     
  9. huki

    huki huk huk ^_^;; Full Member

    6,475
    2
    Nov 12, 2006
    Bernard is the definition of a name fighter who is way past his prime and nothing close to an elite fighter, but continues to pick the correct fights to make money and make himself look like a real P4P fighter. You will see when he fight Calzaghe.

    BTW, what does Hopkins fighting Calzaghe in April have to do with him being elite? Gomez is fighting Cotto, does that make him a better fighter?
     
  10. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
  11. Rudolph

    Rudolph Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,198
    2
    Apr 23, 2006
    Silly thread. Why not compare Wlad with In Jin Chi?