ok first of all im not a fan of either fighter. i'll only be watching next week to see (hopefully) haye get KO'd for being such a crass gob-shite over the last few years. but, according to many people i speak to; Wlad is a load of shite who has only ruled the division (with his bro of course) because the division is the weakest it's ever been. so does this not mean that if haye does manage to win next week, that it's pretty meaningless? if he beats the guy who's only number one cos the division's so weak, then the division doesn't all of a sudden become stronger just cos a new guy is at the top. haye himself has peddled this spiel for sometime of how 'klitschko has ruled the hw division for so long because the era is the weakest ever'. so he's effectively stating that him winning and being top of the pile in 'the weakest era ever' is nothing to put him in the history books then? So what, realistically, will this win do for haye?
devision devision devision. Everyone was also blaming the devision when Tyson dominated everyone, and excuses of his 1 round KO's from some people was "devision wasn't strong enough" . Get over it, he's the best of what he can be, not much competition - NOT WLADS FAULT
A lot, if haye wins wlad is a great champ and its an amazing win, if wlad wins haye was a hypejob, thats the situation no matter what they say klitschko's are still very good.
