Wlad Will Be The Greatest Heavyweight of All Time....He Might Already Be.

Povetkin, pulev, haye, chagaev, ibragimov, Chambers, byrd, Mercer, rahman, thompson, peter, mccline, brock
FU CK off. Thats IMO 2 eras. And he won against all the top contenders. And now he startend to clean out the third ERA with pulev, coming Jennings, fury and stiverne. Some of the fighters are really good.

 

:deal

 

that's an awful list. the only ones with any prime title pedigree are haye and ....well that's it.

POvetkin is worth addingto the list of worthy defences despite not having title pedigree.

 

Hater logic =Wlad is a terrible fighter because in the last 10 years he hasn't beaten a concensus #1 heavyweight (pro tip: wlad is the concensus #1 excluding Vit)

I wonder who he should have fought in the last 10 years that he did not? looks like the next crop of up and comers are queing to get KO'd

 

why are people who sift the good from the ba opponents, automatically wlad haters to klittards?

for instance, if you say povetkin was a fair defence, but some of the others (obviously) wach and pianeta are not. It seems that if you point out whats true in a fair balanced manner, then klittards reject the truth AND reinterpret what you just rightfully said as "because in the last 10 years he hasn't beaten anyone".


why they gotta destroy their own arguments, these klittards?

 

Wlad has one the weakest resumes in heavyweight history

 

Maybe its because you constantly bash Wlad on every other thread, so everyone knows for a fact that you are a Wlad hater. Its not that hard to figure out, dipsh!t:smooch

 

Pretty sure Wlad could somehow manage to pull off epic wins over a washed up Larry Holmes and little Micheal Spinks.
He has wiped out basically 2 eras of heavyweights and is starting on the 3rd, like the above poster stated. Luckily for all the haters, there is no such thing as a time machine. What is he supposed to do? Beat up Floyd?

 

and there you go, without even being able to read your message dan, I can tell that you want to reduce my valid balanced opinion that gives wlad credit for a good defence and vitriol for a weak defence , into simply a black and white interpretation of wlad hate.


why so irrational from you? rhetorical question, I cant read your replies.
but no one will take klittardness seriously until it drops such irrationalities, mark my words.

 

Wow, sounds like I owned Harolgee to the point he couldn't take it anymore. Poor little buddy. I guess I'll accept the TKO victory though😀

 

the guy has one of the most awkward uncoordinated robotic boring styles in the history of boxing, sure he gets ko's but the lead up to those ko's are terrible with all his hugging and holding. the other fighter from this era that will also be considered an all time great is floyd and they will both have asterisks next to their names in the record books.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WF8dcFvMEJs

This sinks your assessment

 

a video of wlad throwing the same punch from the same angle three times in succession, how does this prove wlads not robotic?

surely it proves he IS robotic.

wow dumb klittard post, proving the opposite of what it sets out to.