Wladimer Klitschko's best fight/opponent, and some more to discuss...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by kelics, Jan 22, 2011.


  1. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,444
    11,481
    Jan 6, 2007

    Well it was a very easy fight to score.

    Wlad won nine rounds and Peter won three.

    9 X (10-9) + 3 (8-10)

    =114-111

    All three judges scored it the same way.
     
  2. kelics

    kelics Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,739
    0
    Dec 29, 2010
    **** you with your trolls ****, I'm just asking you ***get learn to read, go to school or something, this troll **** gets boring get ovet it
     
  3. kelics

    kelics Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,739
    0
    Dec 29, 2010
    :lol: He pretends to be be a "God" of boxing :lol:
     
  4. kelics

    kelics Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,739
    0
    Dec 29, 2010
    You missing out some question on this thread:patsch
     
  5. Mordechai

    Mordechai Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,265
    1,304
    Jun 18, 2008
    ibragimov is criminally underrated here. he is by far wlad's best win. ibragimov was a very fast, powerful, sneaky and smart southpaw with a good defense
     
  6. kelics

    kelics Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,739
    0
    Dec 29, 2010
    I gonna have to disagree with you. Have even saw wlad vs who necks? their first fight
     
  7. Mordechai

    Mordechai Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,265
    1,304
    Jun 18, 2008
    i saw all of wlads fight. he got knocked down once against peter, the other two knockdowns were rabbit punches and had no effect on wlad.
    peter was motivated and unbeaten. it's a very good win. but why do you think wlad fought so boring against ibragimov and only safety first, because he had big respect for ibragimov and was afraid of losing.
     
  8. kelics

    kelics Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,739
    0
    Dec 29, 2010
    Yes the fight was really boring, i didn't see it live but when watching on youtube i almost felt asleep. Ibragimon didn't look impressive at all, maybe because wlad neutralized him
     
  9. Mordechai

    Mordechai Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,265
    1,304
    Jun 18, 2008
    yeah the fight was unbelievble boring, but wlad and ibragimov were both afraid to engage. because they both new about the quality of the other fighter. watch some of the other ibragimov fights. he is imo a very good fighte A- grade
     
  10. Kissan

    Kissan I respect box Full Member

    1,353
    221
    Mar 1, 2010
    It was a very exciting fight. If you watch closely, you´ll find out that there was only one knockdown, that hurt Wladimir, the other two kds were rabbit punches and no effect at all. I remember even the commentators saw that, but the judges called them legit knockdowns.
    I think the wins against Ibragimov, Sam Peter I, Chagaev, Byrd I and Chambers were all equally meaningful. Peter was the new hope and called "the next Tyson", Chagaev was a top tier fighter, great amateur, unbeaten and the real WBA champ who had defeated the giant. Byrd was world champ and had only been beaten by Ibeabuchi. Chambers is a skillful and fast boxer who came in in shape. In my opinion Ibragimov was the most meaningful win, but not the toughest. He unified belts, Ibragimov had good wins before, was a skillful southpaw and a good punch.
    @kelics: Sam Peter himself once suffered three knockdowns in a fight but managed to win on points. It was in 2007 agains McCline :good
     
  11. chico g

    chico g Let's watch some Sesame Street...lmao Full Member

    10,832
    12,203
    Oct 18, 2008
    I think Ibragimov, was Wlad's best win in my opinion....
     
  12. FORMIDABLE

    FORMIDABLE Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,664
    6
    Jan 12, 2010
    He has a good list of wins in McCline, Brewster rematch, Peter, Brock, Ibragimov, Chagaev, and the two Byrd fights.

    My favorite performances would be McCline (first big test, had McCline fighting scared and beat him into subsmission), Brock (see McCline), Peter (questions about his chin against a powerful puncher going in, showed his grit coming back from being knocked down to take the W), and Brewster (took balls to take the rematch in a fight he didn't have to take and he forced the stoppage). Chagaev was would round off my top 5.
     
  13. kelics

    kelics Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,739
    0
    Dec 29, 2010

    Oh nice one, didnt know about that(your last sentence)

    You know, when you look st Klitschkos career you wonder... how many virginities did they took.. 10,20 ? :lol:


    p.s virginity i mean undefeated oppenents
     
  14. groom

    groom Member Full Member

    402
    0
    Feb 19, 2010
    do not cry lill Tr***ll,so as i understand,
    you have no idea how to score boxing fight,to know it better ask a guestion ,why peter lost, but not why klit won,even some of klit haters who know boxing will tell you,:deal:patsch it was clear shoot out on points for klit.
     
  15. kelics

    kelics Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,739
    0
    Dec 29, 2010
    I know that i don't know much a about how scoring works, that why I'm asking a questions, do you think the score was fair or not, to see whats everyone saying. Hate dumb people like you, who trying to be smart by slagging of other people.