Wladimir K historical perspective.

Chisora would destroy him

 

Still Wlad is a very different fighter today with a more effective safety first style that protects his glass chin better.

You can argue about physical prime back and forth, the matter of the fact is Wlad is much harder to beat today than 10 years ago. And that's what matters at the end of the day.

The entire "prime" talk is a smokescreen. The question is what is the best version of Wlad? Is the 2012 version better than the 2002 version? There you have your answer.

 

just like chisoras daddy david excusemaker once did ?

 

I agree he is a better fighter today. But I still think any version of Wlad has problems with Sanders. That's neither here nor there though. Wlad was physically primed and experienced for all his losses. Was he a peak fighter at his very best? No. But he was still a prime version that shouldn't have lost. He did though just as many other greats have. Prime is just not a valid excuse to be, just as it isn't when morons say Tyson was past his prime for Douglas. Its just people reaching for excuses.

 

Klitschkos are the very best!!!!!!! I will miss Vitali, but he might fight again, you never know.................Vlad will win the WBC title................

 

But who really cares ??? Absolutely the most bring era ever of the heavyweights... Clinch,clinch and more clinch against bums = zzzz

 

It was already answered truthfully and factually. You just didn't like the answer because it didn't fit your agenda. So how about you....since Elroy is scared do you want to jump in and accept my challenge for him? :yep

 

Grabimir "Jab&Grab" Clinchko.

 

The only one lying is you son. But if you want to accept my challenge than go back and find it. We know how adapt at that you are when it suits you, so you should have little trouble.

 

Now, now...don't be lazy!

 

:hi:

 

Now, now Elle let's tell the whole truth, shall we? You claimed no historians in EE rank Louis or Ali above the Klits. I challenged to show me one and you said there were none and that was the point. I than said I could find at least 1 EE historian saying Ali and Frazier rank higher. If aquamoron thinks the same as you he's welcome to take the challenge. I know you're not man enough and I'm pretty sure the moron isn't either.

 

Every era has been the worst ever era of heavyweight boxers.

So when the heavyweight champion made defenses versus fighters with pro records like 0-0-0, 3-3-0 and 6-0-1 (* lost heavyweight title to newbie ) those eras were better ?

Just to name a few; Louis' "Bums of the Month Club", Marciano, Johansen, Patterson, the Alphabet / Don King only 80s were worse than today. It has been written that Gerry Cooney was Holmes' best opponent and it has also been written that Gerry Cooney was complete **** too.

 

So what you're saying is you had no idea but were trying to pass off a lie until being called out on it. Now that you've been called out on it you trying to rephrase the same words without actually having to take the bet. Fact is you WON'T take the bet because you know you can't win.

 

I love how you guy try and use records from the past like they we're all complete. Boxrec claims from go not all their records are complete but you guys still like to throw out 0-0-0 and 3-3-0 like those are actual and finished records! Lol, whatever keeps you believing boys, whatever keeps you believing!