Wladimir Klitschko # 3 pound 4 pound on box rec?

I don't know, brother. I mean to me, it'd just be proving he could beat an older shopworn version of a guy he totally dominated and knocked out already? I don't see how that's honestly worthy of the ranking of four. If Mosley beats the **** out of Margo again, it wouldn't impress me all that much either though. :conf

 

Nice avatar.

 

Shane ****ing Mosely is on here lossing 2wice in the four fights
or 4 times in his last eleven . or 6 in 15 fights
why ? americas sweet heart maybe

 

how are williams and Dawson higher than Wlad?

 

How dare you......

 

Nostalgia maybe.. i dont know :huh

 

Agree with this.

 

Exactly. :good

/Thread

 

I think he should be top 10 by now, no doubt if he was American he'd be in the Rings' top 10. I don't see how beating Vic Darchinycan and little else makes Nonito Donaire the fourth best fighter in the world, and beating a series of good, but not great, top 10 rated contenders doesn't get Wladimir a spot.

 

Klits are the texbook definition of boxers NOT deserving of p4p recognition.

 

the P4P was done using a rankings poll. 129 forum members voted.

 

So if dominating a division doesn't count...what does? P4P is serioulsy flawed if the idea is to compare technical skills and speed and just leave out size. Being big is a disadvantage when it comes to fluid movement, no wolrd class gymnast or dancer will ever be as big as the Klitschkos. They beat everyone in fron of them, no mandatory has come close to having a chance of beating them, how many boxers currently can say that about themselves?

 

Fair enough... but hasn't Darchinyan improved over the years. I thought he was even P4P number 8 for a while before he tried to move up (and got beaten)...

 

Wlad clearly belongs in the top 10 P4P, he's one of the most dominate champions out there and his ability has never been denied.

 

Where does one find this textbook?