Wladimir Klitschko has passed Sullivan to become the 4th longest-reigning HW champion

But that's dumb as hell. Lewis looked much more fit to continue against Mccall than Wlad did in any of Wlad's losses.

I think you know deep down if they had let Wlad fight on against Sanders or Brewster he would have died in the ring.

Ok.. we get it Wlad rather die in the ring... than stay down. .But the truth is if those fights had continued he would have suffered immense brain damage and than where would the Klittards be?

Imagine if Vitali had continued after the 6th? Where will he be?
******ed, blind and deaf...

Is that what you want?

I can't believe Klittards like yourself are actually saying Wlad's KO Losses don't count because he seem like he 'wanted to fight on'.

 

Of course not. However, Wlad was in his prime when Sanders and Brewster mopped the floor with him.

 

Am I Arguing Agaisnt the Stoppages?....Im Simply pointing out the Hypocrisy in the "But Louis Always Made it to his feet"

Who said anything about Vitali?....Im not even a Vitali Fan

 

I think he was too.

Think about it this way.

When did Wladimir looked the MOST devastating?
2000-2003. He looked amazing against Byrd (I) and against Old 42 year old Mercer. He looked amazing against Mccline.

SO why the HELL wasn't he prime against Sanders? Dude got 40+ fights at the time and he had a career best win in Chris Byrd.

Wlad's offensive+Physical prime was during the early 2000's when he lost to Sanders and Brewster.

His DEFENSIVE Prime is now.

 

Lol.

Norton was the veteran of exactly how many fights when he lost to Garcia? 16? OTOH, Wlad was something like 40-1 AND the WBO title holder when Sanders mopped the floor with him.

You Klittards really ought to stop before you all go full Jim Jones the next time Wlado gets his china chin checked...

 

Wlads Absolute Prime were all Skills Combined to make the Most Effective fighter Likely Peaked around the Chagaev fight to Current...

 

:rofl:rofl If that fits the agenda. I guess it works.

 

Norton was 27.....Nearly the Same Age as Wlad vs Sanders and Brewster....he had also been pro for nearly the same amount of time as Wlad

 

There is a reason Wlad has been unbeaten for nearly the last Decade....

 

rofl

 

Thanks

 

Lol.

It's easy to be "effective" when all you do if fight the Ray Austins, Mariusz Wachs and Jean Marc Mormeks of the world.

 

and when did wlad not get back up again :huh

 

Never mind the FACT that Norton had less than half as many pro fights.

Gotta love Klittard "logic"...