I do not think so. But let us explore for a moment, here is a list of 16 heavyweights. To even be placed 10th, Wlad must displace 6 of them. By the end of his career, which 6 do you think Wlad could be placed above in a p4p sense????? I would very much like to hear your answer on this. MUHAMMAD ALI JOE LOUIS JACK DEMPSEY ROCKY MARCIANO GENE TUNNEY GEORGE FOREMAN LARRY HOLMES EZZARD CHARLES JOE FRAZIER SONNY LISTON LENNOX LEWIS MIKE TYSON EVANDER HOLYFIELD SAM LANGFORD JACK JOHNSON JAMES J JEFFERIES PS: this list is NOT in any order. PPS: I can speak another language.
I don't work, I'm studying, so should you be seeing as you don't know what the word 'sentimental' means. Log out noob.
ATTENTION ALL KLIT-ites...call on the grind now [url]http://www.blogtalkradio.com/OnTheGrind[/url] we are discussing KLIT...
Yawn. If only you weren't such a **** noob, you would probably be aware that I have written extensively on this site about how bias towards olden day boxers irritates me and is totally unfair, and you may also have read my thread where I speculate that Lennox Lewis might be the greatest heavyweight in history h2h, or my posts on how I think Roy Jones Jr at 168 between 1994 and 1996 was the closest thing ever to an "invincible" fighter. But sadly, a **** noob could not know these things. And if you don't like ATG P4P debates, don't bore us by wading into them then. I do value them, I think the vast majority of posters in both the General and the Classic do as well. Oh, and I don't have any parents you stupid ****ing ****. :hi:
on the contrary its a debate which (while ultimately subjective and fruitless with regards to a finality)is the staple diet(metaphorically speaking)of forums like these,and never gets boring only to people who are dogmatic and narrowminded, it is an ever changing debate and so it should be! sentimentality is good in small doses but to let it interfere with ones reasoning and forward thinking is when it gets (as you say) trashy! the personal attack was rather unoriginal.