Yes what part of this do you not understand? I've explained it, David has explained it....YOU ARE WRONG. It's not a matter of opinion, but a matter of fact.
Show me one article after Haye ko´ed Chisora or a public statement from Vitali that he wants to fight Haye.
http://www.boxingnews24.com/2013/02/vitali-klitschko-closes-the-door-on-david-haye-fight/ David Haye was able to fight me on 10 September 2012 in Moscow. He was sent to all contracts. The Briton only had to sign them. David refused. The David Haye train has left. This was the third time Haye ducked Vitali. :deal
Vitali close the door after Haye ko´ed Chisora. Where are new contracts, new negotiations? Bönte and Vitali said: Vitali will fight the winner Haye vs. Chisora.
Total bullsh!t. K2 said fight chisora then sent an offer in after haye signed. Haye agreed to do both fights in 6 weeks and this was rejected. Vitali is the one ducking. Fact
Haye backed out of fight with Vitali 3 times. New negotiations is a waste of time. Haye was never going to fight Vitali. He only runs his mouth to get publicity.
:nut Vitali is clearly the one ducking. Start an ESB poll and see the verdict on that..........or here is charrs version http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nADYwbLn5eU
lol observed event: seconds after the 12th round bell Wlad is holding vitali up on his feet and chisora is STILL wanting to carry on. You interpret that as mentally defeating him? lol He was arguing with both of them after the fight and was ready to carry on. Pure crazy talk
:rofl He seemed perfectly fine. Anyone described like you did above would not carry on like he did at the press conference.
Why people keep on repeating this? It never happened... Frank suggested it and Bonte said ''Sounds like a good idea''. That's it. Nothing was agreed. And if Chisora wins, you really think rematch with Vitali would make any sense? Then why on earth would Vitali and Bonte agree on something like that?