Wladimir klitschko is slaughtered for his level of opposition

[yt]?v=5o5jEzW5cFY[/yt]

Deal with it.

:deal

 

clearly you've got it completely the wrong way round -if you beat someone huge against the odds, THAT FACT is what puts you in the history books and makes you HoF worthy.
And if you beat someone really good then it doesn't mean you are bad - how do you work that out? You appear to be living in topsyturvyland.

and clearly he wasn't doing well for a long period because of fighting with a long term injury during abject poverty. Clearly you haven't seen the film.

man you aren't even a decent keyboard warrior. And you think you are right about Braddock, who was the living definition of a real man.

 

Tell me which victory Wladimir has that is on par with Louis' wins over Schmeling II or Walcott II? Or how many are on par with Baer, Braddock, Carnera, Sharkey? Even faded (Sharkey especially, no question), those former champs and the way Louis disposed them might top any of Wladimir's wins. I'm not sure Wladimir has collected too many victories that are greater than Louis' over then-LHW champs and future HOF'ers Billy Conn or John Henry Lewis.

 

Walcott beat Louis on my cards.

Authentic Great fighters take the immediate and settle the score , which Louis did in spectacular fashion.

Wald ran from every rematch.

Purrity.
Sanders.
Williamson.
And Brewster was retired and had his boxing licence revoked before Wlad called him out.

There is no comparison between Wlad and Louis.

 

Judging by glancing at the last 25 or so posts in this thread, this is a sarcastic statement on your end. Nobody is trying to change anybody else's opinions on it, the above you quoted is simply my own.

 

Again with the blatant lying Brittard? And WTF would he rematch Williamson for when he already won? Seriously, you're an idiot.

 

You are implying Tommy Morrison is a Hall of Fame bound lineal Champion like Baer.



And again, this analogy doesn't fly. Braddock beat three Hall of Famers, multiple top 10 contenders, fought for the lineal title in two different weight classes, won the lineal title, lost his belt to a top 3 all time heavyweight..etc.

Bentt has not done any of these things. He upset a minor belt holder who will never go down as a great, and lost to a guy who never made an impact on the divison. You would have to be trolling to suggest such stupidity.

 

Why cant you Wlad fans just be contend with the fact that your favorite fighter is a hofer and long reigning champion? Why do you make threads trying to knock other fighters resumes in a attempt to make wlad looker better?