Wladimir klitschko is slaughtered for his level of opposition

You'd know why if you watched it , dumbass.

Wlad didn't came anywhere near winning that fight.

 

None of us are professional writers or typists, we are sports fans.
Grammar mistakes happen.

But my god, it at least has to be somewhat intelligble, I can't even begin to translate this mess.

Who cares about the 20 odd losses. Wlad hasn't fought anybody with a resume as good as Braddock's going into the Louis fight.

Braddock took out a hot propsect, the #1 contender, a prime P4P fighter, a Hall of Fame bound lineal Champion, and the next #1 contender.

To match this run, someone would have to beat Wilder, Pulev, Marco Huck, Wlad himself, and Povetkin in an encore.

 

We would have new undisputed Champion who just cleaned up. I think people would give a ****.

 

From 1932 to the Braddock fight, Baer was thought to be unbeatable, just as Wlad is now.

Let's not get too caught up in the analogy. John Henry Lewis is a greater fighter than Marco Huck. Though Huck could still end up being a Hall of Famer fighter before all is said and done.

 

All you guys really have to do is try to make a list ranking their combined 15 best victories. You'll see that Louis has like 13 of the top 15 between them (eh, maybe 12).

 

Prove me wrong.

 

If I'm dumb for saying that, it shouldn't take you very long to make a list that shows your opinion of the contrary.

Lets hear it, Madmanc... 15 best wins between them.

 

This response is irrelevant to my previous post.

You said I was dumb for insinuating that between both Louis and Wladimir, Louis has 12 of the 15 best victories.

Why is that dumb? Tell me why. Actually, show me why.