Wladimir Klitschko now holds the record for the longest reign in HW boxing history

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Mendoza, Nov 11, 2012.


  1. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,560
    Jul 28, 2004
    I wonder what this same record is in the other divisions.
     
  2. Stonehands89

    Stonehands89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,775
    312
    Dec 12, 2005
    Shavers was not #1 at the time. Holmes never fought the #1 because he, like Jones, was overly concerned with easy money and baby games and not concerned enough with fighting all comers.

    In their defense, they probably didn't really know the difference because of the way things were and still are. However, if they were as willing as they were surely able, they would have had a true crown.

    As per the Ring ratings, there is no other that can match it in terms of longevity or authoritativeness. They began in May 1928 and, to a considerable number of fans/writers, ended in 2012.

    The point is that we need objective, consistent rankings that can be used to identify the champion in history. Until this year, I'd use with The Ring ratings....
     
  3. Stonehands89

    Stonehands89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,775
    312
    Dec 12, 2005
    ....while lufcrazy goes with his best guess.
     
  4. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,029
    22,140
    Sep 15, 2009
    it's how boxing is today.

    we have 4 or 5 claimants per division and these are ranked by objective people.

    if Robinson v Bell is good enough, I see nor fair basis to demand 1 v 2 as the only relevant way to fill what you call a vacant crown.

    In short, I don't view your lineal title above any of the others. I believe the man makes the belt, now more so than ever before. I would love their to be just one belt with prestige that everyone fought for, but that doesn't mean we can rewrite history.
     
  5. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,579
    Nov 24, 2005
    When Holmes fought Shavers in September 1979, I expect Holmes was #1. Ali had announced his retirement.
    Who was #2 ?
    If it wasn't Shavers, I'm surprised - because it should have been.
     
  6. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,579
    Nov 24, 2005
    Wlad is a more clear cut case though, and maybe I shouldn't have brought up Holmes.
    I still consider them both champions.
     
  7. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,029
    22,140
    Sep 15, 2009
    Stone, our dispute on the relevance of lineage aside, who do you consider to have been Ali's successor?

    Tyson v Spinks?
     
  8. young griffo

    young griffo Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,499
    7,270
    May 18, 2006
    Wlad does what he has to and has dominated everyone he's fought for the better part of a decade, for what that's worth.

    The guy he just beat Mariusz Wach has to rank as one of the most inept fighters that I've seen challenge for a world title. He was big and brave but he was so slow, had a woeful punching technique and sub par skills. It's a win over an undefeated fighter for Wladimir but seriously someone like Louis or Tyson would've destroyed Wach in 1-3 rounds despite being so much smaller. He's a spud pure and simple and Wlad not going for the stoppage is why he's not wholey embraced by fight fans.

    It's a pity because Wlad is what a champ should be. He's busy, always fit, happy to meet anyone (his brother excepted understandably) and isn't scared of rematches but beating rubbish like Wach or Peters etc will always give his detractors ammunition about ruling over a poor division, whether that's fair or not and his safety first mentality always gives the impression that he's wary of letting it all hangout for fear of another Sanders like disaster.
     
  9. Theron

    Theron Boxing Addict banned

    6,597
    35
    Sep 2, 2012
    When an exiting fighter comes along Wlads accomplishments will be widely ignored imo.
     
  10. Theron

    Theron Boxing Addict banned

    6,597
    35
    Sep 2, 2012
    The only thing people will be thinking of is the new exiting fighter and will want to ignore things that have happened in a boring era.
     
  11. Stonehands89

    Stonehands89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,775
    312
    Dec 12, 2005
    Holmes was #1 and I'm pretty sure that John Tate was #2.
     
  12. Stonehands89

    Stonehands89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,775
    312
    Dec 12, 2005
    You cannot redo what was never done in the first place. The WBS racketeers came into the sport and made an absolute mess of it, far worse than Carbo -who at least left the thrones alone.

    Sorting through the mess is a giant job and you don't know if you like my "lineage" because it is as yet unpublished.

    Robinson-Bell was 66 years ago. Why not go back 86? How would you propose filling vacant thrones then?
     
  13. Stonehands89

    Stonehands89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,775
    312
    Dec 12, 2005
    Tyson follows Ali. Tyson and Spinks were ranked 1 and 2 at the time of their fight.
     
  14. Stonehands89

    Stonehands89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,775
    312
    Dec 12, 2005
    Great post.

    Wlad and his brother are both real credits to the sport.
     
  15. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,942
    46,764
    Feb 11, 2005
    In the heavyweight division, size IS an asset and an obstacle for the opponent that has to face it. By definition, it is the one division with the greatest size disparity contained within. Wach is big, strong and has an anvil for a chin. That is a combination that goes far in heavyweight division in any era. Heavyweights are just different. It's almost a different sport.