Wladimir Klitschko-Ruslan Chagaev question...

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by ishy, Jun 5, 2009.


  1. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,589
    27,253
    Feb 15, 2006
    I would add that I expect Wlad to be closer to his optimum on fight night than Chagaev.
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,015
    48,113
    Mar 21, 2007

    This is the bottom line.

    Chagaev has boxed six rounds in 18 months against mediocre competition and looked rusty. Before that, he fought Skelton over 12 and looked close to gassed - Skelton has been stopped by inferior opposition since.

    If Chagaev, who has been training for a title fight, somehow turns the clock back he has a very good chance. But I don't think that will happen. The odds don't favour it.
     
  3. Boilermaker

    Boilermaker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,372
    473
    Oct 6, 2004
    underneath is a post that i made a while ago. this is based on title claims which started from the date of Lennox Lewis' retirement. As you can see, Vlad and Chageav are the fighters with the largest claims to existing titles, and it is actually amazing how man lineage claims they have. Eventually, all lines will lead to one person, imo. Based on the sheer numbers of titles and general circumstances, i think that the winner of Vlad-Chageav will have a right to acceptance of the title of the World Heavyweight
    Champion.

    By the way, in double checking a few things to make sure that lineage hasnt changed as any of these titles, it looks as though i have made an error with regards to the lineage of the Nigerian title. This appears to be held by Russian Chageav and not Fimpong. So that should really add to the prestige and claim of the Chageav - Klitchsko winners Claims!
     
  4. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,146
    25,337
    Jan 3, 2007

    I concur,

    Chagaev is facing by far and above, the best opponent of his 12 year career. No one else he's faced even comes close. What's more, he's arguably coming off the worst slump of his career. As you say, he has looked ordinary against mediocre comp, and I'll ad to it by pointing out that most of wins over the last 3 years have resulted in split or majority decisions.. I like Ruslan Chagaev, and would hate to see him lose his "0", but I'm afraid he is out of his league, and taking this fight on such short notice is going to benefit Wlad more so than him...
     
  5. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,545
    16,037
    Jul 19, 2004
    IMO, hell no!

    As far as I'm concerned, the lineage was broken when Lennox called it a career, regardless of what Ring might say.
     
  6. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,545
    16,037
    Jul 19, 2004
    That much is true, and I have repeated a similar sentiment throughout various other threads.

    That said, this still isn't worthy of starting a new lineage.
     
  7. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    Why not? Moore vs Patterson was a comparable fight, except that Moore had just lost to the previous champion ("so he can't be the possible new linear"), and Patterson wasn't half as established as Wlad is right now.

    Quarry vs Ellis, same story. Burns vs some guy, same story. These are two undefeated beltholders who have both been in the top5 for several years now. The winner has every right to be called the linear champion.
     
  8. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,122
    Jun 2, 2006
    Like Suzie says, I suppose it is a positive step for the division,though I was rather looking forward to the Haye fight .A glance at Chagaev's record emphasises the dearth of quality heavyweights, Skelton is 42 ,Ruiz is on a perrenial comeback and Valuev has no power,I wont be paying for this one and expect a dreary fight,with Wlad the winner.
     
  9. DamonD

    DamonD Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,285
    40
    Nov 19, 2004
    I have no problem with this being for both the Ring and Linear crowns.

    Even if the last couple years have been very rough for Chagaev he is still undefeated, in my eyes the true holder of the WBA belt, and Ring's #3 which would fit in with the #1vs#2 or #1vs#3 rule they've had in effect for a while now. Chagaev is certainly a more deserving #3 to me than Sanders was in 2004.

    Wlad deserves it for the way he's rebounded from the Brewster loss and faced pretty much the best comp of any of the other champions/contenders at the moment. You can argue about the quality but I don't think you can really argue about it in terms of what others have been doing.

    Vitali would be the proverbial fly in the ointment, except he's Wlad's brother and it makes for an unusual situation. What would normally be a massive (and given their qualities, a very good) fight in the making is more of a pipe dream. Even on the tiny chance they would ever fight I'd expect a Byrd-Williamson style affair with neither wishing to inflict serious harm on the other.

    I still wish we could have The Man though, not The Men.

    I also agree that Wlad-Chagaev isn't going to be much of a fight. I'll be happy to be wrong but Chagaev has not looked good since the Valuev fight. All-round you could rate him better than Haye but he lack's both Haye's power and explosiveness, which were basically the only two things that were giving Haye the chance to win. I don't think Chagaev's good technique and combinations are going to be enough.
     
  10. kolcade4

    kolcade4 Keep Punchin' Full Member

    1,592
    5
    May 1, 2009
    this scenario is so ridiculous. i want wlad to get his ass handed to him by chagaev for the sheer fact of watching this guy lose. if wlad wins then heaven forbid the brothers fight. these two guys picked the same profession and believe me i would love to see them fight. i accept and respect that they never will BUT one of these two need to step aside and stop holding the 1 and 2 spots hostage. they have created an extremly weird scenario.its kinda like if you pick on my brother im gonna get you.
     
  11. kolcade4

    kolcade4 Keep Punchin' Full Member

    1,592
    5
    May 1, 2009
    i want wlad to get his ass handed to him by chagaev for the sheer fact of watching this guy lose. if wlad wins then heaven forbid the brothers fight. these two guys picked the same profession and believe me i would love to see them fight. i accept and respect that they never will BUT one of these two need to swtep aside and stop holding the 1 and 2 spots hostage. they have created an extremly weird scenario.its kinda like if you pick on my brother im gonna get you.this scenario is so ridiculous.
     
  12. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    Age and youth are not issues for Chagaev. With him its injury or illness. Chagaev is a hard worker. Turing back the clock for Chagaev means staying in the gym, which he has for this fight. If Chagaev wasn't healthy or in form, he would not take this fight.

    While Chagaev didn't look great vs Skelton, Skelton was a tough nut to crack. In fact Valuev and Ruiz are hard guys to stop too.

    I think Chagaev is the clear cut #3 guy right now, and would be a top 5 heavyy in just about every era. In fact, I think Chagaev is better than a few X lineal champions and has done enough to be viewed as a top 100 all time heavyweight, but that is a separate thread.

    If Wlad scores a solid win over Chagaev, the Klitschko's will put some serious distance between them and the field.
     
  13. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,015
    48,113
    Mar 21, 2007
    AND inactivity. 6 rounds in 18 months against mediocre competition is not kind of preperation for the best heayvweight in the world, whether he is in the gym or not.

    Agree with this, but my point regarding Skelton was specific. Chagaev had his man hurt, i believe in the tenth, and he stepped of the gas - he was tired - Skelton was literally awaiting an onslaught on the ropes and Chagaev gassed against a non-general non-puncher who was about as likely to be trapping as Audley Harrison.

    In this case he had been out for less than a year.

    Inactivity does not suit him.

    Please note that Skelton, though he may very well be a "tough nut to crack" was stopped by Martin Rogan, a taxi driver from Belfast fighting his first twelve rounder one year after the Chagaev fight.
     
  14. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    Chagaev fought this year. Inactivity in boxing is best described as length of time in-between fights. Chagaev has been in the gym training hard for the fight of his life vs Valuev. While Valuev isn't the best heavyweight in the world, he is for certain a top ten guy. In addition, Chagaev trained to fight a tall opponent. Wlad has the harder adjustment to make as he was training to fight a quick handed, rangier guy, not a stocky south paw.

    In closing I believe since Chagaev has fought recently, and has trained hard to meet Valuev he will be in shape. the ring rust will be a non-issue. I would not call Chagaev in-active for the above two reasons. A good weight for Chageav is about 227 pounds.




    I think we have to look at styles, the circumstances of the late rounds, and he other guy gain or lose. Chagaev is not going to risk a late round loss to put his guy away. He took the win.

    Rogan is a gun slinger type. He had a lot to prove, and was down ( I think ) on the cards before landing the bomb. In addition, Skelton was old for both fights, and sometimes older fighter who were just thought a tough fight as Skelton was vs Chagaev age quickly in the ring before our eyes in their next outing. If Chagaev was down on points vs Skelton, and had Skelton hurt, he would have pressed for the late round stoppage win.
     
  15. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,015
    48,113
    Mar 21, 2007
    If you say so. I say that 6 rounds in 18 months is pretty inactive.

    What I mean by that is this - it can sometimes take a fighter more than one fight to shake of any ring rust they have accumilated after a long lay-off. More than that a fighter sometimes NEVER reclaims prior form after a long lay off. You seem 100% convinced that Chagaev will not be rusty. I find that surprising.

    A "non-issue"? Extraordinary.

    I think the level which a fighter campaigns at is absolutley crucial. Drummond had never even boxed 12 rounds before meeting Chagaev. He beat a man who was 1-2 in his last fight before he met Ruslan. He was way out of his depth, it showed, and still Chagaev did not look great.

    From this, you seem to expect him to be at 100%. Going from this type of level to the best in the business after an 18 month lay off following a fight you looked poor in against a fighter who was stopped against a domestic level opponent one year later - no. "Inadvisable" doesn't really cover it.

    Your attempts to paint this as a more difficult change of opponent for Wlad than Chagaev reeks of bias.

    The best I would bet on seeing out of Chagaev would be a Skelton type performance, way below the best we have seen form him. I hope I am wrong.






    Skelton is not a puncher. Skelton is not a general. The only reason Chagaev would be risking the loss would be if he were risking exhaustion, which i feel he wax. This has nothing to do with style or circumstance, it is a jaded fighter returning from illness struggling to pull the trigger. There is no confusion about this issue as far as I can see. Ruslan was genuinely sick. He came back tired.