Wladimir Klitschko Should Be More Appreciated

100%
Usyk p4p is higher, but Wlad has great longevity

Joe Louis never fought a pile of Fraziers or Foreman types, yet he is rated very high

Wlad imo should be more appreciated. 20 plus title defences for a decade takes some going, especially from someone who had previously been painted all over the canvas on a few occasions and was disregarded at a time

People are saying Dubois has had a great turnaround and I agree, but Wlad took it to another level

 

41 year old Wlad would’ve absolutely destroyed this version of Joshua. All those left hooks that Joshua was slipping back then would be landing flush.

 

Wlad is a top 15 guy before last night and he is a top 15 guy this morning.

 

Wlad is an ATG, perhaps doesn't match up as well head to head but he was a the clear dominant heavyweight for years and that counts for a lot. I have him 9th or 10th on my ATG list and this is coming from a person who was a big critic of his during his reign. But over time my appreciation of him has grown and he went from 12th on my list to now at worst 10th.

 

He's hugely appreciated and is one of the longest reigning world champions of all time.

Vitali was better though and is a top 5 heavyweight for me.

 

Usyk is an all time great but at Heavyweight, Wlad beats him in my opinion.

With Usyk not offering much threat of a KO and being much smaller, Wlad would dominate from the outside. Look at how he dominated other world class cruiserweights like Haye and Povetkin. Yes, Usyk is better than both but Wlad beat them much easier than I think Usyk would've.

 

He gets more respect now than when he was actually fighting funny how that works

 

Decade long reign with Louis. He's way better than top 15.

 

With 0 signature victories, as a disputed champ dividing an era with his brother.

Top 15. We have been fighting under Queensbury rules for a long time, and there are lots of guys to consider.

 

Povetkin and Haye were "signature victories," a meaningless phrase used to denigrate a guy who cleaned up and elevate others who didn't.

 

Povetkin was not even a champ.

Haye is a guy who lost to a LHW.

These were good fighters, but not great ones.

Not Foreman, Frazier, and Liston.

Not Baer, Walcott and Schmeling.

Not Holmes and Spinks.

And on and on.

 

He's somewhere between 6 and 10.

He beat a lot of good fighters, some of them underrated: Ibragimov, Chagaev, Byrd, prime McCline, Barrett, Pulev, Thompson, Jefferson, Haye, Jennings, Povetkin, prime Peter, Rahman, Chambers, Brock, and Botha. And he beat nearly all of them impressively, by KO or TKO.

Many were undefeated: Brock, Peter, Chagaev, Ibragimov, Jennngs, Pulev, Povetkin, Pianeta, prime Wach, Castillo, Shaheed, and Vujicic. Others had only one loss, and he stopped quite a few who had never been stopped before.

 

He's certainly not in the top 10 heavys of all time and for good reason. There's a long list of fighters who could have ruled the division for 10 years facing the competition he did, that's not his fault but it is what it is.

 

Wlad rebuilt his style after devastating losses and went to dominate the division for decade. It wasn't always pretty but this is something to be appreciated because it is incredibly hard.

Also, Wlad would outpoint Usyk. Bad style matchup. He never had problems with smaller technical boxers.

 

He's behind Ali and Louis. He's fourth all time. There simply isn't an "on and on." Tyson is at five because he lost at the halfway point of Wlad's reign.

And if you want to play this game, Ibragimov, Haye and Povetkin get the best of Baer, Walcott and Schmeling. Erase Liston because he hurt his shoulder and the second fight was poorly officiated. Foreman gasses out against some of the bigger, more durable guys who Wlad fought and Povetkin had 25 pounds on Frazier, with better technical skill than Foreman. Holmes in 88 might've lost a decision to prime Pulev. And Spinks wasn't out of their league.