Wladimir Klitschko vs. Alex Leapai on April 26 in Germany

Who did Manny, Martinez, Ward, Bradley, Floyd fight who was beyond 20 world ranked. No other champ fights bottom feeders like Wlad does.

And Wach was the guy with no ranking.

 

Then the 90's were shite.

 

How can Klittards possibly defend this fight, or Pianeta, Wach, or Mormeck?

 

dinovelvet is getting owned big time.

 

no, one bad egg doesn't mean you throw away all the eggs in a box, that's idiot logic. are you admitting you are an idiot who throws away all the eggs? course not.


but Schultz was still shite.

 

Wladimir just defeated Povetkin. Assuming he fights Pulev (or even the WBC title fight winner) after Leapai, that's okay.

 

yes wlad beat povetkin, you gotta give him credit for that one, but not the other four.

 

No. The 90's were a very good era, MUCH better than this one. Let's look at the HWs in the 90's:

Tyson
Bruno
Morrison
Bowe
Lewis
Holyfield
Foreman
Ruddock

 

and, I would add, Schultz was still shite...burp...

 

once again, you make statements that aren't true... i said 'many champs fight TOP 15 guys for voluntary fights"... I never said "TOP 20"

again to remind you...Pianeta was:
WBA #12.. (only 2 over top 10)
WBO #9...(IN the top 10)

he was far from Top 20..........Who said anything about top 20?

Like I said... I wasn't a great fan of the Pianeta fight (i don know others were offered the fight first) but for you to say "NOT RANKED" is just more of your BS of NOT looking at actual facts when you post your crap about Wladdeal

 

and pianeta was shite.

there is a pattern developing here that surely klittards can see.

 

' voluntary fights' in k2 means fight the worst opposition available. I see no other champs doing what Wlad does.
Holding all the belts its his responsibility to defend against the next best contender.

I told you Pianteta was WBO #9 so i admitted i got it wrong but that doesn't change the fact he was a former sparring partner and was a disgraceful cherry picked opponent.

 

And how did he get all the belts again exactly?

 

The 90's legend and unoffical lineal and undisputed champ Alex Schulz is not shite. Looking back at Axel Schultz. Is it fair to say he is a top 10 HW's from the 90's? I think so yes and here's why.

Looking at his record it seems so. Schultz he perhaps unfortunately is known for suffering 'The Three way Robbery' during his back to back title fights against Foreman, Botha and Moorer. Luck certainly didn't shine on this old school war horse. Due to his wins over Moorer and Foreman (coming of his best ever win infact) in his career it seems fair to say so. If those two make it into your top then it seems scandalous not to have Schulzty well within. He deffo should be there imo.

http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthread.php?t=489322&highlight=Schulz


Do you see how you made that mistake you boxrecer?

:deal

 

You forgot Klitschko and Schultz. Two major players in the 90's.