Wladimir Klitschko vs. Alex Leapai on April 26 in Germany

Funny, but I think we're going to be waiting a VERY long time for these examples.

 

It's quite irrelevant how "physically strong" Leapai is. He can't box. And Wlad can. That's all you need to know about this fight.

 

I saw it published on line and in the sports section of the newspaper-
looks like we get a free one.

 

nah dont worry.. but wlad better not play for too long with leapai because a lucky punch is there for leapai

 

Every now and then a good fighter can beat a good boxer. Will it happen this time? I doubt it, but you never know. I'm just hoping Leapai comes to make it a rough night for Wlad, match him in the clinching dept. and make him fight.

 

Lol, you're an idiot. Pray Wlad loses, if he does I'll he never post again. I just want to hear you root against him. In the meantime why not post the links to all those blowouts in the last decade for Wlad? :yep

 

Leapai has a right uppercut chance. That is about it but Waldimir will not stand still waiting for that uppercut to land flush.

 

Agree Ivan, his right uppercut is big danger punch. Big uppercut. Like Lewis, only bald.

 

I think this is as bad a mismatch as Mormeck, Leapai is wayyy to short, slow, no jab, poor stamina and average chin. If he lands a single solid punch I'll be surprised, Wlad should take him out fairly early but this has the potential to be a stink fest.

 

Two words: Kevin Johnson....who incidently is 3-6 since. atsch

 

But...bu...b......the uppercut, dude. The uppercut.

 

Lol, point taken! I was a little slow on that one but I get it now! :good

 

They are already talking about the chase of Joe Louis' consecutive defenses record, which is unrealistic. It would take Wladimir about 4 years to break it, and he would have to fight 3 times a year. If he believes he can do it, then good luck, but it would be wise to retire before 2016. What would be more realistic, is to defeat Leapai, then win 4 more fights and set a new record for the most wins in title bouts.