Wladimir Klitschko vs. David Haye - Sept or Nov - Germany

Don’t know.
Maybe he wanted cool trophy after the fight.

It still didn’t make it legimate title.

At the time it had same credibility IBO and IBA have now days.
But yes its legit title nowdays (weakest of the four though)

 

You all look the same to me.

 

With Sulaiman at the WBC and the regular champion, super champion **** at the WBA...I'm not even sure that is. Just the youngest. Of course the WBA and WBC will probably never be surpassed by either the IBF or WBO even if those titles are eventually seen by the majority as more credible because let's face it, fighters want their names attached to the longer lists with the larger amount of great fighters. It's to be expected. Older doesn't mean better but the history is something you can't fight. I consider the IBO as gaining cred. Far more than the IBA. I see it as the best minor title out there at least. They're still responsible for craziness but they have some things going for them and having at one time this past year the Heavyweight champion and the largely recognized p4p number one sporting their belt when they have more prestigious ones is kind of interesting.

I don't even know exactly what that means, kindly trolling friend.

 

Just because somebody is trolling, don't mean what they're saying it ain't true...

 

I don't even know how that reply fits with me looking the same as all of some group or another. Who all looks alike to you? Stop talking in riddles and start talking with your mind! And when I say talking I mean typing you damn troll!:twisted: And when I say typing with your mind I mean typing with your fingers after using your mind. And when I ...aw, hell, I'm getting out of here.

 

:hi:

 

What a waste of time discussing these paper belts. WBC, IBF, WBA, WBO. Who the hell cares? They're all worthless paper belts. All that matters is

1. how long have you defended your paper belts, how many mandatory challengers were defeated?
2. who (bum or top 10 contender) did you beat at what stage of their career (prime or over-the-hill) in what fashion (completely dominate/KTFO or win a slim decision)?

If you consider these two metrics there is only one champ at HW and that's Wlad. Like him or not but you can't call yourself champ without beating him.

I find it downright ridiculous when the British press refers to their own David Haye as "Heavyweight King". How embarrassing.

 

U Just couldt work out the riddles could u boxed ears bloody troll.

 

It's a waste of time to talk about the legitimacy of the belts but not the defenses of the belts in question? What? :huh

 

I find it tiresome differentiating between the four. IMO none is better or worse than the other. The only difference is the level of opposition beat in order to obtain it.

Can one mix in IBO, WBF and God knows what other BS belts? Sure, fine. As long as one fights top opposition instead of bums in the process that's all that matters.

 

You will aswell, once the Klitschko sisters have been dealt with. :yep

 

Then Wlad hold the WBA title and not Haye. FACT.

 

What????:huh

 

Fact: If you emphatically say ''fact'' before or after a statement, it makes said statement both intelligible and certifiably true. FACT.

 

Steve Kim @ Max Boxing:

"- Hearing that while talks are underway between the camps of heavyweight titlists, Wlad Klitschko and David Haye, Sky TV of Britain, is pushing for a Haye- Audley Harrison fight. I wish I were joking but I swear, that’s what I’m told."