Wladimir Klitschko vs. David Haye

Don't drink and type.Infact don't type:hi:

 

Hey FW, when has anyone ever KO'd Rahman within 4 rounds? For that matter, how many fighters have ever KO'd the Rockhead period?

Lewis, Maskaev, Holyfield, Tua...pretty good company!!

 

You forgot Toney again.

It doesn't matter about the Rahman from years ago, that Rahman is long gone - a distant memory. I'm talking about the version of Rahman that steps into the ring at the moment, and he's nothing but cannon fodder these days. It was a good opportunity for WALDO to make some kind of statement and yet again he failed to deliver, despite all the spinning coming from his fan-boys.

 

Toney was ruled a no contest, A#s-munch!!

 

The Toney fight has been erased from the memory of all Klit-ites:yep

 

actually it has been erased all together:yep
and like I said. 1 fight result has nothing to do with the other. Who cares who KO earlier, later, its irrelelvent.

 

That was a bull**** decision though in fairness

 

:huhElaborate

 

Toney vs Rahman? Why do people keep acting like that fight meant something? Rahman beat Toney in the first two rounds... caught a headbutt in the 3rd round that opened him out and CLEARLY ruined his vision. Immediately after the headbutt, Rahman started getting hit with right hands that he obviously couldn't see coming anymore. The fight was stopped and ruled a no contest.

Why are people acting like Toney went in there and embarrassed Rahman?:huh Rahman won 2 rounds to 1, and only lost the 1 because of the headbutt which the fight was stopped because of.

 

This may not have been the case prior to Rahman fighting Klitschko

I am not acting like it meant anything but people list the people who have stopped Rahman to put Wladimirs victory in a different light but they fail to list Toney.Why is this?:thinkCoincidence maybe?

 

In truth,Toney vs Rahman didn't mean anything like you say.It was a Wednesday night.Rahman clearly didn't want to be there either.He must have had a table booked somewhere

 

Because Toney didn't stop Rahman, maybe?

 

No Rahman quit.Thats even worse

 

It
was
a
headbutt.

Why would Rahman continue fighting when he couldn't see right hands anymore? Rahman never said that he quit. The doctor asked if he could see, and Rahman answered him truthfully. He said that he couldn't see clearly. What's wrong with that? Should Rahman had lied so that Toney could win due to Rahman's bad vision from a headbutt? That's silly. Did you notice that Toney didn't have ANY success against Rahman until after the headbutt? Why do you think that is?

 

I would have loved to of discussed this topic with you after the fight and before the Rahman/Klitschko fight ever was.
It was a headbutt,correct.Lets get that straight first off.I understand that.Rahman started shipping right hands and wanted out.Telling the doctor that he couldn't see was the easy way out and he knew what would happen if he told the doctor that.
Unless I'm mistaken,I recall him complaining about the cut rather than just waiting for the doctor and answering his questions