Wladimir Klitschko vs. Jersey Joe Walcott

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by KobeIsGod, Mar 2, 2008.


  1. KobeIsGod

    KobeIsGod Who Necks?!? Full Member

    7,318
    6
    Jan 7, 2007
    I think this would be an interesting matchup. Could Walcott and his cute boxing style utilize foot and upper body movement to slip inside and deliver his hookercut or would Wlad keep moving and keep Walcott on the end of his brutal left jab setting him up for the straight right?

    Walcott wasn't a runner so there would some good two-way action imo.
     
  2. Jbuz

    Jbuz Belt folder Full Member

    3,506
    7
    Oct 22, 2004
    Wlad would knock him out.
     
    ascended likes this.
  3. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    who is greater or who would win?

    Walcott was a cruiserweight by today's standards, and thats without any weight draining.
     
    ascended likes this.
  4. KobeIsGod

    KobeIsGod Who Necks?!? Full Member

    7,318
    6
    Jan 7, 2007
    he's comparable to Liston. nearly the same height and probably 15 pounds less when each was at their respective primes, 210 and 195.

    Walcott had some damn fast hands and boy could he crack. great left hand.

    i think walcott is a pretty underrated hw champ who was a great counter-puncher. maybe i should have put it in the classic forum :think

    i think Walcott's foot and upper body movements would cause some problems for Dr. Cottonhammer. He was a very awkard fighter. Marciano had major problems with him in their first fight and he gave Joe louis all he could handle in both of their fights.

    Remember Louis had a great jab too but Walcott really neutralized it with his unorthodox style. He just made the mistake of trading combinations with Louis in their rematch.
     
  5. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    Honestly Wlad takes this one with ease. not even close.

    In terms of greatness odds are on Wlad surpassing Jersey Joe by a longshot.
     
    ascended likes this.
  6. KobeIsGod

    KobeIsGod Who Necks?!? Full Member

    7,318
    6
    Jan 7, 2007
    Well i agree Wlad would win but not with ease. But if Dr. Cottonhammer came out too tentative, Walcott could time him. Joe had the power to certainly stop him imo. Walcott threw sharp puches especially hooks and uppercuts.

    I'm pretty sure i know who Bert Sugar and Teddy Atlas would pick :oops:
     
  7. Jazzo

    Jazzo Non-Facebook Fag Full Member

    9,543
    4
    Feb 5, 2006
  8. Rudolph

    Rudolph Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,198
    2
    Apr 23, 2006
    If they were the same size Walcott outboxes him
     
  9. RonnieHornschuh

    RonnieHornschuh ESB indie police Full Member

    6,024
    17
    Mar 21, 2007
     
  10. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,015
    48,117
    Mar 21, 2007
    I'm surprised by some of the opinions in this thread and I've got to question whether you guys have seen a great deal of Jersey Joe. Certainly opinions like "he is to small" won't wash for this great fighter.

    Wlad has every concievable physical advantage BUT Walcott has these advantages:

    Handspeed
    Craft
    Heart

    I nearly added generalship, but Wlad is actually an excellent ring general - in terms of creating climate for victory - so we'll leave that for now.

    Now, combining these advantages with Wlad's apparent deficiencies - severe reticence, seeming fear of the punch, in fact (I share Jim Watt's theory that "no-one has graver doubts about his chin than he does") - Walcott has a very serious chance.

    Overall, Walcott is the type of fighter that can put anyone on their ass with his combination of talents.

    My guess is that all of this is not enough to overcome the Wladimir physicality, but all of those predicting "easy win" haven't seen a great deal of one or the other on film.

    Klitschko WPTS 12

    OR

    Klitschko WPTS 15.

    But Wlad visits the deck as many times as he did against Peter.
     
  11. joekirkbycobra

    joekirkbycobra King Of The Ring Full Member

    3,966
    2
    Jan 4, 2008
    walcotts beter wlad would b 2 big tho
     
  12. Sakura

    Sakura Boxing Addict banned

    3,605
    7
    Nov 22, 2006
    Wlad's smallest opponent was Exum Speight 207 lb and Prime Walcott was 190 lb...
    [url]http://www.boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_id=11028&cat=boxer[/url]
     
  13. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,015
    48,117
    Mar 21, 2007
    For what little it is worth, Walcott was bigger than 190 at prime by about 7 pounds. Unless your disputing that his two wins over Charles and his valiant losing effort to Marciano are not the best we've seen of him?

    If he was better than he was in those efforts i'd probably make Walcott favourite.
     
  14. RealIzm

    RealIzm Boxing Junkie banned

    12,032
    2
    Oct 12, 2007
    Walcott by murder.....you people really are deranged
     
  15. Sakura

    Sakura Boxing Addict banned

    3,605
    7
    Nov 22, 2006
    Walcott was also outboxed by Henry Taylor, Billy Ketchell...and they never was most talented boxers.
     
    ascended likes this.