Wladimir Klitschko vs. Rocky Marciano

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by cross_trainer, Aug 18, 2009.


Who wins?

  1. Wlad PTS

    17 vote(s)
    15.9%
  2. Wlad KO

    64 vote(s)
    59.8%
  3. Rocky KO

    23 vote(s)
    21.5%
  4. Rocky PTS

    1 vote(s)
    0.9%
  5. Draw

    2 vote(s)
    1.9%
  1. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,016
    48,121
    Mar 21, 2007
    the ****
     
  2. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,272
    23,979
    Jul 21, 2012
    Master boxers Moore , Charles and Walcott couldn't keep Marciano off them.

    Ask modern great technicians Toney and B-hop who they take inspiration from. They won't tell you Jess Willard or Louie Firpo.
     
  3. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,016
    48,121
    Mar 21, 2007
    What the **** are you talking about? How does Marciano's relentless pressure style indicate at any level that he has a better defence or better mobility? Honestly, you just don't make any sense at all sometimes.
     
  4. Foxy 01

    Foxy 01 Boxing Junkie banned

    12,328
    131
    Apr 23, 2012
    You are trolling with this ridiculous statement, right?

    Then again perhaps your not. After all you are the one who claimed Frazier could use his famed " head movement " to avoid Klitchko's shots in the same way David Haye did. Miserably failing to notice Haye did everything in his power to keep as much distance between himself and Vlad, whereas Frazier would be right in front of the big Ukraine.
     
  5. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,272
    23,979
    Jul 21, 2012

    Dempsey ran at ya with his hands down. He operated at a lower level so he got away with it.

    What master boxer did Dempsey ever beat? Rock beat every elusive , slick boxer mover he ever faced. He cut them off without fail. Walcott was a superb backfoot fighter who set cunning traps.

    So whats out there to indicate Dempsey had better defence and mobility when he's never beaten anybody as tactically sound as the guys who were hammered by the rock?
     
  6. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,016
    48,121
    Mar 21, 2007
    :lol: what's wrong with you? Some of the defensive moves he makes in the first minute against Wilalrd are superb, and certainly better than the **** that you see Marcaino doing.

    Dempsey wasn't a Mayweather but these ideas you have about Marciano and Dempsey were just werid.

    Tommy Gibbons, Jack Sharkey, Battling Levinsky and probably Billy Miske. Don't waste my time with this BS.

    Yeah, he did it with pressure and physicality, and he was brilliant at it. But he was pretty easy to hit for an ATG and his footwork was pretty plodding. Demspey was far quicker on his feet and this is absolutely clear on film.

    First and foremost: film.

    Secondly, he has :lol: apart from that, good job with that post.
     
  7. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,272
    23,979
    Jul 21, 2012
    Sharkey was handing him his A-hole before Jack won with a foul punch. I believe it would have been like Ortiz out boxing Mayweather , then Maywether winning the way he did.

    I never seen those other guys fight. Were they as good as Moore, Walcott and Charles? Or even LaStarza. Im reading Gibbons gave Jack a close fight over 15 rounds.

    Yeah , Dempsey was a lot quicker. Does that mean he has better movement than Joe Louis as well? Quicker isn't better.
    Surgeons like Walcott would use that against him.

    Dempseys era was too raw and crude imo. The boxing artistry had developed more finely in Rocks time. Boxing writers had not seen what it would become when they were printing how Jack was the greatest who ever lived.
     
  8. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,016
    48,121
    Mar 21, 2007
    Yeah, and you're entitled to your opinion, but you may have noticed there are quite a few on this forum who debate the point? Either way, if you're making a list of excellent boxers that Dempsey beat, Sharkey is on that list. So what are you complaining about?

    You've never seen Tommy Gibbons fight? Maybe you ought to watch Dempsey's most important fight (in my eyes) before you start spouting about Jack Dempsey?

    There's absolutely no need to debate opposition, or even to discuss how Dempsey would do with Charles. Marciano beat these men for reasons besides the ones you are comparing them in. Read that twice.

    Who cares? Are you trying to say that because Louis had better footwork than Dempsey, Marciano does? Why are you complicating matters. Here's a simple statement: Dempsey's footwork was better than Marciano's. Why are you talking about Joe Louis? If your sincere point is that faster doesn't mean better, yes, I know that.

    Again, hugely debatable. When I watch Tunney and Dempsey box I don't see much that doesn't belong in this era apart from the low hands and Dempsey's lack of workrate on the jab.

    I can see things like that watching a fight from this weekend, too.

    But even if you're right and Dempsey's era was cruder, he is still faster on his feet and had better footowork and he still beat master boxers from his era, so you're still wrong.
     
  9. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,272
    23,979
    Jul 21, 2012
    You could argue Vinny Paz had better footwork than Pea if its about speed.

    I wouldn't say Tunny was crude , but then he shut Dempsey completely out. Would Gibbons and Tunney been able to survive a chest full of Rock for 15 rounds?

    Imo he had the better footwork since its tried and tested against great slicksters.
    I hear Rock had bad balance too but i don't agree with that either.

    Great fighters can put you off balance. Make you miss. Being off balance isn't always incumbent on the fighter himself. Many more guys who came after Rock had worse balance. Its a criticism that has stuck with him.
    One of the Rocks best abilities was creating leverage he put on shots. You can't create leverage without good balance.
    You can't distribute weight to deliver duel handed power shots without good balance.
    You don't throw a savage right hand like the suzie Q without good feet and good balance.
     
  10. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,343
    1,536
    Apr 26, 2015
    "Dempsey was a fine meld of great puncher and great boxer". Tunney

    The punches just prior to Dempseys Ko blow of Sharkey were NOT low. Period and end of story.
     
  11. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,710
    46,379
    Feb 11, 2005
    Yes, Marciano was a veritable ballerina.

    Funny how these Marciano reach around fests go for hundreds of pages but any match-up at lightweight or middle or welter gets 3 replies. A real depth of knowledge being demonstrated in these parts.


    Now, let's get back to talking about Churchill's war crimes.
     
  12. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,016
    48,121
    Mar 21, 2007
    Why would you do that? It'd be drunken.

    I would hazard a guess that Gibbons and Tunney would both survive to drop decisions, yes.

    Wtf, look, Marciano's case for having better footwork and being better defensively, does not lie on your or my opinion of how he would do in a 15 round fight with Gibbons or Tunney.

    OK,so when you make a list of the best footwork, you just start at the top with the one who beat the most slickesters, and work your way down. Then i'll laugh at that list.

    What do you mean you "hear"? He did have bad balance (for an ATG), and it's pretty clear on film, but he overcame it in style. It didn't really matter for him because he worked it in.

    Right, but there is a difference between obtaining balance in order to "do a good punch", which every human being that doesn't suffer from a disability should be able to do, and then there's being a naturally balanced athlete. Rocky wasn't a naturally balanced athlete. That's why they worked so hard to teach it to him.
     
  13. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,272
    23,979
    Jul 21, 2012
    I knew i shouldn't have done it , but i went and did it anyway.

    It gets said that he had terrible balance and two left feet. I read it on here over the last few days again.
    I think thats over exaggerated. Lewis had worse balance than Marciano but its not a flaw commonly associated to Lewis like it is Rock.
    For a guy who threw the kitchen sick every round , id say he had pretty good balance.

    He wanted to be a baseball player initially and was one of the top players in Brockton as a youth.. Having solid balance is a major component of batting a home run swing.
     
  14. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,016
    48,121
    Mar 21, 2007
    Probably, but it shouldn't take anyone more than a few seconds of watching film to know that Dempsey was the better balanced of the two.

    For all that it can be argued that Marciano was a more affective fighter.
     
  15. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,343
    1,536
    Apr 26, 2015
    The only area you can compare Dempsey and Marciano is as a puncher. In just about every other department Dempsey was superior. Both ATG hwt champions both with ATG attributes but Dempsey fought at a higher level technically.