Wladimir Klitschko vs young Mike Tyson - no holding and cheating allowed

Not me.

Peter was a useless unskilled bum who couldn't even beat Eddie Chambers.

That only exposes Wlads faults and weaknesses , not his strengths.
Peters can get inside over and over which proves Tyson with faster feet and an ability to cut the ring of and land to the head and body would batter Wlad same as Brewsters did.

David Haye fights nothing like Tyson. Tyson showed in 90 seconds what he does to guys coming up in weight . And Spikns >> Haye all day long.

 

No , he was the majority favourite to beat Peter. Peter was a hype job and everybody knew it. Saying that proves you were not following the sport at the time.
Every forum poll had Wlad winning by large.
You followed the sport in 2016 and i exposed this fact over and over since you created your account.

 

Ahh I get it, every fighter Klitschko beat was a bum and Tyson was simply untouchable and has only champion and after champion on his resume who he conquered.

That explains why Mike was able to become one of the longest reigning champions in Heavyweight boxing history by being undefeated for over a 11 years meanwhile Wladmir ended up so broke he had to fight on when he had no love for the sport and lose to the likes of Danny Williams and [url]Kevin McBride[/url] and make WWF freak show appearances to fund his cocaine addiction.

Oh sorry, have I got the wrong the men mixed up here?

 

Never once was Haye ever refereed to as a 'modern day Tyson' .

They tried to pass the remains of Mormeck off as a Mike Tyson clone.

One again you oust yourself as a newbie who hasn't enough knowledge on this sport to fill a match box.

 

there must be 32 people on here that DKSAB. 88 tyson vs a non clinching wlad would have been like david vs goliath. R.I.P Klitschko!!!

 

Forum polls mean nothing. There is life outside the internet. Maybe you should try leaving your basement to find out for yourself one day.

The media, journalists and boxing pundits were anticipating Peter's to beat Wladmir.

Why you continue to make moronic false statements in an attempt to puff yourself up I have no idea.

If I only followed the sport from 2016 how do I know so much? I must have a mind like a sponge to have digested so much knowledge about an array of different fighters within such a short period of time?

Meanwhile your knowledge is limited to calling Wlad Grabimir and criticising all his victories.

 

You're delusional - and that's being kind. The version of Tyson that Lewis beat was shot to ****. Had that been '88 Tyson, Lewis would have got KO'ed - and probably early. Same goes for Wlad..

 

Preach the Gospel!

 

You asked me what bullies Wlad dealt with while with Steward. I then provided a list of fighters and now you are attempting to dimiss my points suggesting they were all bums.

FYI David Haye is compared to Mike Tyson all the time, the majority of it coming from his fan base. Many fighters have been compared to Mike Tyson who show a little bit of aggression and power.

 

Prime Mike *destroys* Dr Robotinik.

 

No , pundits and journalists all heavily favoured Wlad to win.

Just like everybody heavily favoured Vitali to win coming back after a 4 year lay off without a tune-up.

Peter NEVER looked elite and everybody who had even a basic understanding of the sport could see it.

He never carried anywhere near the same level of hype as Jeff Lacy carried. Instead of blowing the hype away in lop sided fashion like Calzaghe , Wlad ran , cowered and held from bum Peter like his life was at risk.
Wlad would likely never step inside the ring with Tyson. Different levels.

 

So you believe in the myth of "prime Tyson". Do you also believe in the tooth fairy?

Tell me this: A very average nobody like Bonecrusher Smith went 12 rounds with "prime Tyson", hugging him at will and wrestling him around in a 12 round snoozefest. But that same Tyson would blow Lennox Lewis out of the ring "early". You're delusional.

 

You are mentally unhinged when it comes to discussing Wladimir, so it's pointless expecting you to concede any points that you are clearly wrong on.

You will give no credit to any of his opponents that he conquered and no credit to his ability in the ring, dismissing it as jab and grab like some special needs 12 year old who just discovered how to bash the keys on his pc.

Meanwhile the ''could have been'' and ''what if'' Mike Tyson who had a buffet of bums on his resume, and who always was left found wanting whenever he stepped up in competition, manages to escapes criticism and then we zealots believing he'd have wiped the floor with someone who remained unbeaten for over 11 years.

You are moron and I have no idea why I'm even entertaining your stupidity but, please do us all a favour and I think I speak for everyone here - go and visit Belgium, there they will gladly give you euthanasia for free without hesitation, as soon as they hear you open your mouth.

 

I second that!!



Plague Rat Dumbovelvet

 

It's funny isn't it! Tyson got taken the distance and troubled by Mitch Green and also dropped and stopped by Douglas. But Wladimir Klitschko gets "Walked through" by 5'11" 220lb Tyson that had his skull bashed by a boxer that was similar in size, strength, power and skill to Wlad in Lewis.

"B.. B.. But PRIME TYSON destroys Wlad AND Vitali on da same night doe!"