Wladimir Klitschko's legacy without smaller heavyweights?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Pugilist_Spec, Oct 13, 2015.


  1. Pugilist_Spec

    Pugilist_Spec Hands Of Stone Full Member

    4,937
    787
    Aug 17, 2015
    The cusk of my argument flew right over your head. I am not denying the existence of SHWs. I am not saying that 220 pound men are the average for the modern division. I am saying that, despite the fact that these behemots are around in massive numbers, the best heavyweights are frequently smaller men. This is a fact.

    And no. All of the fighters I listed in the OP range from 210-225 lb. That's pretty much the standard weight of a heavyweight 30 years ago.
     
  2. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,415
    21,845
    Sep 15, 2009
    For a start I wish people would stop crying about the possibility that Wlad is being slated.

    Secondly it's a very interesting point. So few huge athletes exist at the top level but that is something usually parrotted about. There seems to be one or two top quality SHW fighters in each generation but the rest of the field is maybe 10lb or heavier on average than previous years.

    Still, one of the very best SHW fighters in Bowe was out pointed by a former CW and Vitali was stopped by a former MW. So size isn't the be all and end all as much as I once thought it was.

    I tend to think if a fighter proved himself against a SHW he could succeed today. With that in mind almost every great HW champion would have a very good chance of success, the only man who didn't really beat any SHW fighters was Rocky Marciano so I just couldn't predict how he would do today but I see no reason to assume he could beat a man 50lb heavier than him.
     
  3. andrewa1

    andrewa1 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    7,005
    2,071
    Apr 8, 2013
    Uh no, your argument fell apart under its own weight. I took apart your argument piece by piece and showed it to just be a hit job on Wlad's opponents (and thus Wlad), claiming without evidence they are overweight. The fighters you listed are a small number of his overall defenses, a majority but not totality of his best defenses, and are still heavier than most hw top contenders more than 30 years ago (your argument seems to be have evolved from implicitly stating much more than 30 years, to now just a bare 30 years ago).
     
  4. andrewa1

    andrewa1 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    7,005
    2,071
    Apr 8, 2013
    Crazy post. You think if someone beat ONE SHW, no matter what kind of quality, that means they could succeed today?! That's insane. There have always been SHW's. The relevant feature is that they have become more and more common, and thus the skill base they have has become greater and greater. Also, your examples are among the worst imaginable, Bowe Holyfield? Bowe decisively showed himself better, winning 2 of 3 (and arguably all three) and Vitali lost primarily due to injury. And both Holyfield and Byrd were much larger than Marciano.
     
  5. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010
    on the otherhand, if rocky had eaten all the pies till he topped 240 lbs, he would easily defeat every SHW.


    welcome to planet K.
     
  6. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,415
    21,845
    Sep 15, 2009
    No that's not what I believe at all.

    I believe if a man is able to beat a top level SHW he removes the reasoning "he's to small to compete"

    There might be SHW fighters with more skill or more stylistic advantages but picking someone purely because they are bigger doesn't wash when a man has already beaten the biggest out there.

    I'm pretty sure Rocky was the one man I didn't pick to have any success.

    Holy was able to beat Bowe. Byrd was able to beat Vitali. Would Dempsey be able to beat Wlad? I'm not sure but if I picked Wlad it wouldn't be because Wlad is too big I know that much.
     
  7. andrewa1

    andrewa1 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    7,005
    2,071
    Apr 8, 2013
    Bowe basically beat Holyfield three times, Byrd posed a stylistic challenge to Wlad but won because of an injury.

    You're just using different words to describe exactly what I described. Your assuming Willard re comparable to Wlad Klitscko. Completely different animals. Willard was a huge freak who could box some despite very limited athletic abilities, comparable in that respect to Valuev, except Valuev was massively larger. Dempsey fought in an era where there were vastly fewer and vastly less skilled SHWs. Willard was "top" back then just because he was huge and could box a bit, the Lewis's and Klitschkos of the world are as large or larger than him, but massively more talented. They compete in an era where SHW's are not just freaks, but everyday opponents, with a much broader array of skills.

    And heral, no one is saying Rocky would be better if he gained 60 pounds of fat. Might he have been more dangerous with 25 pounds of mixed fat and muscle? Maybe, as long as it doesn't compromise your athleticism to much (as 60 pounds would) fat in proper measure isn't necessarily disadvantageous.
     
  8. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010

    its too funny andy, you keep it up.


    layer on the fat to win the prize.!!
     
  9. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,415
    21,845
    Sep 15, 2009
    But only he didn't beat Holy three times. Byrd didn't beat Wlad neither.

    I'm not talking about less skilled opposition, I'm talking about hugger opposition. If a man has flattened a SHW you can't use the argument that SHW fighters are too big. You can say a certain fighter is more skilled and would win but you can't say "fighter A wins because he is 30 pounds heavier".

    I would assume you're a Wlad hater by the way your posting. It's a bit naive to assume Wlad only wins because he is too big for his opponents. He wins because he has an incredible jab, genuinely concussive power that can end a fight any time and a clinching game that means he never has to compete from close-mid range. As well as that he has the fitness to fight his fight for 2 full rounds. I guess I just rate Wlad a bit higher than you do.
     
  10. madballster

    madballster Loyal Member Full Member

    37,210
    6,765
    Jul 21, 2009
    And which accomplishments are those? Holyfield's record is a joke compared to Lewis'.
     
  11. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010
    moving up to win the hw title and defending it.
     
  12. camtweee

    camtweee Member Full Member

    238
    0
    Jul 30, 2015
    Being the first 4 time Heavyweight champion aint a bad accomplishment considering he started at Cruiserweight
     
  13. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010
    yeah a lot of, people rate evander as a top ten hw atg. I can see why.

    the peds are a serious problem in that rating though.
     
  14. ludwig

    ludwig Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,049
    59
    Apr 29, 2010
    Asking those guys to fight at 200 is stretching it. They'd have to resort to Guillermo Jones style weight-cutting drugs.

    Haye claims it was getting more and more difficult for him to make 200 and I believe him.

    Best scenario for boxing is a new heavyweight class 200-225. 225+ becomes super heavyweight.

    Heavyweight could be a good division for television if it was restricted to 200-225. Fat heavyweights like Arreola and Ruiz would cut to make it as they would realize they have better chances in this division then 225+. Champ level heavies like Povetkin and Chagaev would come into fights in better physical condition, having had to make weight.

    Although 225 would be within reach for Wilder, it would be a bridge too far for a late-career super heavyweight champion like Klitschko or Lewis. Champs at 200-225 would have the option of challenging Klitschko for the super heavy title without risking their heavyweight title.
     
  15. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,088
    6,685
    Sep 8, 2010
    He had a size advantage over almost all of his best opponents. We get it.