Wladimir Klitschkos Legacy

Certainly Wlad needs to be placed somewhere around the top 10-15 spot somewhere. One of the greatest HWs of all times, a fantastic achievement. Wlad's ambition, discipline and attention to detail are an inspiration to many.

 

"I did what any smart person would do, I studied tapes. I took advantage of his weaknesses, I made a plan and I followed it out. That's the only way to beat a guy like Wladimir Klitschko. He's a great fighter as you can tell. He still has his title and I told people not to give up on him after I defeated him. But I was just the better man that day because I was the most prepared, and I beat through that way, with determination," -


See more at: [url]http://www.*******.com/lamon-brewster-reveals-how-he-beat-wladimir-klitschko--34890#sthash.RM8GjImk.dpuf[/url]

 

You made that up yourself.. Good effort.

 

[url]Lamon Brewster Reveals How He Beat Wladimir Klitschko [/url]
From Scene Jan 19. 2011
Intreview by By Lem Satterfield

I did not fabricate any article. It's there on the Scene. What an absurd accusation from a battered and beaten troll.

 

Another broken link. Keep on trollin , Troll.

 

I've always had him as 10-15 all time at HW and this
fight didn't change that. This fight really did nothing to
grow or tarnish his legacy.

 

You know direct links to the Scene are not allowed.

Good thing there is another posting of the article. Bad for you though, since you were trying to pretend it didn't exist. Do you care to apologize?

[url]http://www.boxnews.com.ua/en/news/8245/2011-01-19/Lamon-Brewster-Reveals-How-He-Beat-Wladimir-Klitschko[/url]

 

Yes. Its ridiculous to claim a stoppage loss can move a guy higher up the ATG rankings.

 

So you aren't man enough to admit you are wrong and apologize for that false accusation? Why do insist on being an old woman, apologize like a man.

 

Top10-12 sounds about right.

 

These are just numbers. Wlad fought in a weak area and was practically never in a good fight.
Certainly that argument holds up. Fury, Ortiz and Joshua are better than anybody Wald fought in his career.
I am not sure prime Wlad beats them.

Teh RING Magazine had Wlad at place 16th recently. That sounds about right to me.

 

That is not correct. Fury was a novice biut was favourite and considered a fighter on the way up

Once again not really a good argument as Valuev had also shown to be better with some of his wins and Fury showed he was levels better really because of one win, and that is over an old HW who you are trying to discredit. So your own argument has back fired a bit.

I could name several HWs who have not achieved anything remotely close to Valuev, so I can only assume you are taken in by what others say? Also who is talking about Chagaevs greatness? We are saying Chagaev beat an undefeated 46-0 world champ who was bigger than Wladimir. That is a fact and not up for dispute

 

That's actually around place I have him.

 

Kentucky Cobra posted the link. Where is your response?

 

Brewster said he was and he said he wasn't. I'll take my Brewster's word over your Brewster's word.