Wladimir vs prime Ali

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by liljp361, Aug 11, 2010.


  1. Brit Sillynanny

    Brit Sillynanny Cold Hard Truth Full Member

    2,653
    4
    May 1, 2009
    Who? The vampire versus Ali?

    :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:



    Surely you can't mean a Klit.


    Get serious ....
     
  2. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    66
    Dec 1, 2008
    Hard fight to figure. The size difference would make it an interesting fight. P4P Ali is so much better, but with the size Ali would lose a decision.
     
  3. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    Wlad lost to Sanders who had faster hands than Wlad. If we are talking about prime Ali...prime Ali would box Wlad to death as Wlad would be too slow for Ali. Wlad lost to Sanders and Brewster. You can say styles make fights lol...but Ali had a style of moving and using the jab that would lump and cut Wlad to ribbons.
     
  4. liljp361

    liljp361 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,676
    56
    Jan 6, 2007
    rightcross you really are on wladimirs nuts but atleast you try and make sensible reasoning behind your point of views....

    but the problem rightcross is wladimir doesnt like being hit. what will happen when he wont be able to time somebody who has good defense and can be in and out or the threat of being countered? Ali doesnt just have foot speed and dances around. He has good upper body movement and lateral movement and this trouble ANYBODY

    Wladimir is very good your right but he has shown vulnerabilities...

    a prime motivated to win Ali finds ways to win. He adapts.

    the only reason Wlad has a chance is 1 reason like i said: his left jab

    I just think it seems you put Wlad a lil bit too high on that pedestal there for some reason
     
  5. difO

    difO Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,682
    0
    Dec 13, 2009
    jesus christ. cant believe some of the posts in this. the klits are good, but beating 100 tin cans doesnt make you great. i wish a george foreman like fighter would appear and just brutally ko them O_O
     
  6. Showbox Mike

    Showbox Mike Member Full Member

    478
    0
    Jul 25, 2010
    Ali wins by late stoppage, and that is being nice. Why?

    Look at how a slow and green Calvin Brock tap danced his way into the lead on the scorecards against Wald, before his lack of a chin and defense let him get caught. If he had the skills and stamina to keep that up, he would have won by UD over WALD.

    Look at how Wald struggled with TOny the Tiger Thompson. Tony QUIT in RD 11 and decided to take his paycheck and go home. But he was taxing Wlad's stamina, who looked like that same guy who gassed out and got KOED against Brewster and Purritty,

    Look at how Wald dealt with little Sultan Ibraginov. He had to go 12 ponderous rounds with him cause he was worried about his speed. Little Ibraginov had something that made WAld just want to slap his gloves down and be done with it. WAld flinched every time little Ibraginov feinted, all nite long.

    Look at how a fat, natural LHW like EDDIE CHAMBERS took Wald into the last few seconds of round 12, before he decided to lay down and collect his check.

    Look at how an awful, crude, non-boxer like SAMUEL PETERS had Wlad ready to eat a good combination and go out on his back THREE times. Wald will beat the softened up Peters easily in the rematch, but it dont change **** about what happened the first time.

    Can't nobody on this site tell me a prime Ali wouldnt do better than those guys against a prime Wald. He possesses a group of skills and attributes that none of WALD's opponents ever had at the same time. Ali has 15 round stamina on top of that.

    Wald hasnt lost since 2004. But he aint fought no ATG's either. Wald can beat everybody out there now, but there aint nobody out there now who could crack the top 20 in the 70's.
     
  7. RightCross

    RightCross Grandmaster of Boxing Full Member

    10,533
    3
    Aug 3, 2004
    This whole post is a riot, but this statement is deliciously ignorant:happy