Wladimir vs Rahman is on!!!!!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Vincent Gottschalk, Oct 31, 2008.


  1. Vincent Gottschalk

    Vincent Gottschalk Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,020
    4
    Feb 16, 2005
    That's the word on the streets:good
     
  2. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,291
    23
    Sep 21, 2006
    figures hed pick the quitter out of his choices

    this fight hurts wlad impressive win or not
     
  3. jc

    jc Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,968
    14
    Sep 9, 2004
    Rahman s an inevitable late sub in reality.

    my prediction is Wladmimir turns a fight which should last a maximum of 6 minutes into a 9 round jabathon before TKOing him late on.

    Though it will probably be more entertaining than the potential Wlad - Potvetkin 12 round bore...:-((
     
  4. rock_lv

    rock_lv Active Member Full Member

    809
    0
    Sep 28, 2007
    wow, Toney-Wlad would have been much more intriguing. Apparently Rahman has very little left in him from seeing the Toney fight.
     
  5. MattMattMatt

    MattMattMatt Guest

    Wouldn't it be terrible if Rahman got another lucky punch KO and became a two time HW champion?! I can't bear thinking about it.
     
  6. Borincano

    Borincano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,261
    7
    Mar 1, 2008
    One thing is for sure, anything can happen in HW fight.
     
  7. DamonD

    DamonD Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,285
    41
    Nov 19, 2004
    I have no problem with this fight.

    Given the need to get in a substitute, and that others are already tied to fights, Rahman was one of the few choices that made sense.

    He's got a top ten ranking with about 3 of the boxing orgs, given recent form Wlad would be hopeful of a good knockout after the long Ibgraimov and Thompson fights, and he has a degree of name value still.

    Toney might've been more entertaining, if nothing else for the promos, but after that it's the untested and the unknown. Rahman is a decent stop-gap pick.
     
  8. COLD-HARD-TRUTH

    COLD-HARD-TRUTH Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,566
    8
    Sep 21, 2008
  9. magnificentdave

    magnificentdave Constant Reminder Full Member

    1,788
    1
    Sep 14, 2006
    I agree, Rahman is beyond washed up. Klitschko could have atleast fought Maskaev, who coincidentally called him out.
     
  10. natas206

    natas206 Crazy Tiger Kim Full Member

    244
    0
    Oct 20, 2008
    co-sign. This fight is pathetic!!! All that **** about how James Toney doesn't deserve a shot and Rahman gets a shot instead?? haha, what a absolute JOKE the heavyweight division is!!

    Only slightly interesting foreseeable fight is Haye vs Klitschko (either one). Other then that, what do we have to look forward to? Oh that's right; Valuev vs Holyfield!! **** yeah!
     
  11. voodoo5

    voodoo5 ESB SAGE Full Member

    164
    98
    Oct 27, 2004
    Perhaps in terms of retaining a degree of marketability.
    In my view, Rahman has been in steady decline for the last 6 years.
    I wont be watching.
     
  12. SAS2

    SAS2 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,173
    2
    Jun 24, 2006
  13. EpsilonAxis

    EpsilonAxis HNIC Full Member

    6,491
    2
    Jul 24, 2004
    It's still not that bad a fight. Rahman is a live underdog.

    Too slow though. Wlad will crush him.
     
  14. 2ironmt

    2ironmt Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,903
    1
    Jul 20, 2004
    nah good replacements would've been arreola, golota, or maybe even chambers. maskaev and rahman should have to beat even a top 25 guy before being taken seriously again (given how bad maskaev looked vs peter).
     
  15. Rico Spadafora

    Rico Spadafora Master of Chins Full Member

    45,743
    4,353
    Feb 20, 2008

    The reason he was picked as because Steward knows Rahman like a book and he is a name in America and a former Champion. He at least has a punchers chance the others didn't.